February 20, 2007
Serious Eats.
Found this great new food site,
Serious Eats. Lots of different things, articles, links to noteworthy food-related posts on the webs, and a
Serious Eaters forum with recipes, advice and such. The newest frontier in recipes is
videos demonstrating how to do it, and they have lots of them here. Very nice site, well done. Found this nice video all about
choosing cheeses, thought I'd note it for future reference, I can never remember these things. Interesting details on the differences between goat, sheep and cow cheeses.
TIPS FROM STEVEN JENKINS
Stop at four cheeses: "To serve more than three or four cheeses at a time is an insult to all the other ones that you've chosen."
Offer variety: "Make sure that all three or four cheeses you've chosen are as different from each other as possible ... in terms of intensity of flavor, the style of flavor, the texture, and the animal." Get a goat, a cow, and a sheep, Jenkins says. "Get something that's gushy, that you could just poke at and not even use a knife with, and then I want you to go increasingly more firm texture."
Ugly is beautiful: "Opt for cheeses that are funky-looking, that are rustic-looking, that are primitive-looking—cheeses you never see in a supermarket because they're rough or pebbly or gnarly or moldy. That's going to be a cheese that's worthy of you."
Looks like they're doing an ongoing series of videos about
barbecuing. Have to keep that in mind too. This site is kinda fun. Like the Food Channel, except you can pick what you want to watch.
permalink, posted by mike on Tuesday, February 20, 2007 at 03:17 PM
January 30, 2007
Seventh annual weblog awards: 2007 Bloggies.
The voting is on the for the
Seventh annual weblog awards: the 2007 Bloggies. I really don't care about the voting or who wins, but it's always interesting checking out the nominees for new and interesting blogs. Almost anyone who makes it to the finals is probably worth reading. I always find someone new.
permalink, posted by mike on Tuesday, January 30, 2007 at 12:21 PM
April 03, 2006
Koufax award winners announced.
The folks at Wampun have announced the winners of this years
Koufax Awards. Lots of great blogs listed there besides these winners.
The winners list:
Best Blog -- Non Professional
Crooks & Liars
Best Blog -- Professional or Sponsored
Josh Marshall of Talking Points Memo
Best Blog Community
Daily Kos
Most Deserving of Wider Recognition
Echidne of the Snakes
Best New Blog
Glenn Greenwald of Unclaimed Territory
Best Writing
Digby of Hullabaloo
Best Single Issue Blog
Jordan Barab of Confined Space
Best Expert Blog
Pharyngula by P.Z. Myers
Best Group Blog
Shakespeare's Sister
Best Post
Bag News Notes for Katrina Aftermath: And Then I Saw These
Best Series
FireDogLake for Plame coverage
Most Humorous Blog
Jesus' General
Most Humorous Post
Dood Abides for The Wizard of Oil
Best State or Local Blog
Bluegrass Report and Tennessee Guerilla Women
I'm not really a big fan of these awards since I object to the efforts made to institutionalize divisions in the US which I don't think really exist, and since I don't happen to believe that very many, if any, of these people qualify as "leftist." For one thing, they support the Democratic party, which is awfully right-wing these days, although they wish to deny it. But I do appreciate all of the work they put into it.
permalink, posted by mike on Monday, April 3, 2006 at 01:17 PM
February 24, 2005
Iranian bloggers for peace.
Via Alternet's
News Log I found that there are about 75,000 blogs in Iran. And a new group called
Iranian Bloggers for Peace.
Admidst the rumblings and mumblings and threatening and blustering and posturing currently poisoning relations between the US and Iranian governments, has anyone asked the Iranian people what they want? Even a cursory glance at the thriving
Iranian blogosphere makes it clear that a majority of the country's citizens want peace. When do they want it? Now! There are approximately 75,000 blogs in Iran (Iraq, by comparison, has only about 50), amounting to a virtual independent media controlled by the citizens.
The new group blog,
Iranians For Peace, launched by Iranian journalist N Alavi and other Iranian writers, is a platform for a diverse array of anti-war voices from all over the globe. Writes blogger Sima Shakhsari, "... this is one way of telling the world that despite our differences, we do not want the U.S. military, or any other military for that matter, to attack Iran."
A few more Iranian blogs (in English) not to be missed are Shakhsari's own
Farangopolis,
Iranian.com and
No War On Iran.
permalink, posted by mike on Thursday, February 24, 2005 at 08:12 PM
2004 Koufax Award winners.
The folks over at Wampum have just announced the
Winners of the 2004 Koufax Awards. Lots of links to interesting blogs over there, although most of the them are the standard ones.
I know the folks at Wampum put in a lot of work to do these awards, but I can't say I'm all that impressed. I personally thought the behaviour of the so-called "leftist" blogosphere during the election year was abominable: dishonest, rude, irresponsible, and hypocritical. I was really disgusted, and still am. And to call themselves the "Left" while supporting someone like Kerry, whose proudest boast is that he volunteered to go kill commies is rather appalling. I don't see anything "leftist" about the ideas and policies promoted by most of these blogs. I think they're mostly about attempting to evade responsibility for their actions by blaming everything on Bush and the Republicans. Which is kinda disgusting.
And yes, they are dishonest. Especially in the failure to acknowledge and address the incredible corruption and corporate malfeasance of so many of the Democratic politicians. But what do I know?
Sorry I sound so angry, but I think most of these people are living in a dream world, and by doing so making things worse not better. For instance, leading people to believe that there's even the most remote chance that the Democrats would change or improve anything is ridiculous and immature.
permalink, posted by mike on Thursday, February 24, 2005 at 01:19 PM
February 23, 2005
Women and blogging.
Kevin Drum of
Washington Monthly made a
post about the lack of women editorializing or blogging on politics, or what he perceives to be a lack this. As you would expect, he got
lots of responses.
Meryl Yourish: "A (female) blogger sent me this link to Kevin Drum being an idiot (yes, I know, he is often an idiot, but this time, it's personal—he mentioned women bloggers)."
And this one, where she doesn't call me an idiot: "The scholarship behind Drum's thesis simply boggles the mind. Why, it's as if he took all of five minutes to think about the issue before he wrote his post."
Trish Wilson: "I get so tired of this same stupid question coming up every three months. The guys don't read or link to political women who blog, and then have the audacity to feign innocence every two months (from three, previously). They wonder where we are. As we have said the last three or four times this discussion has come up, we're out there. You just have to take the time and energy you take to link to and read the primarily middle- and upper-class, white, male bloggers and find us. Guys, you have no excuse."
Random Thoughts: "I'm tired of this discussion. I'm tired of the comments that say women aren't as analytical, competitive, interested, bloviating, or motivated. I'm tired of reading about the boys network at the top, even though it does exist."
Pinko Feminist Hellcat: "Having the gall to point out that yes, we exist, is apparently unforgivable. The attacks women go for this--women who stated this quite civilly were called hysterical and accused of attacking people. They were also called dykes, ugly, manhaters, moonbats, and had their looks derided and their appeal to the opposite sex questioned. Because, you know, that's civil."
Brutal Women: "In other news, the fucktards are back."
Avedon Carol: "On the other hand, I'm staring you right in the face, Kevin, and even though you've said you read me every day you don't have me on your blogroll. It's things like this that make me tear out my hair when people wonder why women are underrepresented in the top-rated weblogs, or journalists, are whatever."
Media Girl: "[Some poor schmoe named Aaron is] nothing like the horses asses and raging bulls that litter the landscape, like the goombas and ninnies who pop up periodically to wonder why women bloggers aren't more popular, or the fuckwits who wield misogyny like a phallic sword."
Ilyka Damen: "Having proposed the most supportable theory, that 'there are plenty of women who blog about politics but they don't get a lot of traffic or links from high-traffic male bloggers,' a theory supported by a quick review of
his own blogroll, Drum concludes instead that the delicate flowers of blogdom are averse to the medium's 'fundamental viciousness.' What can you say to that beyond, 'Bitch,
please' . . . ?"
What She Said!: "The saddest part of this all, Kevin, is that there are some really excellent writers out here. There are women writing extraordinary commentary, with sharp analysis and flawless arguments and you'd rather waste time in another gender-jerkoff than reading it."
Echidne of the Snakes: "There is one theory about all this that has some merit, I believe, and that is that some men don't want to read what women write (unless it is on sex), so if a blogger can be identified as a woman she will lose those readers whose print looks too feminine...."
Ayn Clouter: "As noted below, Kevin Drum has stirred up the usual hornet’s nest about under-representation of
femmes pixelle on the web. This tempest in a herbal tea pot is missing the really big picture far above the heads of all these busybloggers."
Sisu: "We can say right up front that the shallowness of Kevin Drum's argument turns off this woman. Maybe we're in a Pauline Kael bubble of our own, but most of the women we know -- fellow bloggers, readers, friends and relatives -- adore fiery political discourse and keep coming back for more."
Conglomerate: "I know from trying to get a group blawg together of female law professors, that most of the participants were pressed for time. Blogging is a second (or third or fourth) job after teaching and writing, and a lot of the women that I know have a few extra jobs anyway with child-rearing."
Ann Althouse: "
Sigh. Why is he assuming that promulgating opinions is a mean and domineering sort of behavior? I've certainly noticed that a lot of bloggers that I find unreadable display this tendency, but I think the best blogs are reasonable, good-natured, humorous, and well-rounded."
Long story; short pier: "You want to know what the funny thing is? The ice-edged gut-punching joke of it all? Five minutes spent perusing any feminist comment thread or discussion group would be enough to rapidly disabuse Messr. Drum and his commentariat of the idea that women aren’t 'comfortable with the food fight nature of opinion writing.'"
Loaded Mouth: "In reply to your idiocy, I refer you to What She Said!. Then maybe, just maybe, you could start linking to women bloggers instead of using the old and busted (not to mention repeatedly debunked) 'Where are they?' argument."
Dummocrats: "Drum's hypothesis is that opinion writing on the web is too vitriolic and rough for delicate females. Clearly he's never read one of Lucas' takedowns of Michael Moore. But, all kidding aside, he may have a point. Sometimes the comments on the site
do get pretty rough. The language is nasty and personally, I refuse to deal with that."
Elayne Riggs: "I think, if anything, female bloggers should be thanking Kevin Drum rather than piling on his latest version of the every-three-months "where are the women bloggers/why aren't women bloggers more 'famous' or 'popular' (i.e., listed higher up in a self-selecting ranking system)" discussion."
James Joyner: On the food-fight nature of political blogging as a turnoff for women: "It's as good a reason I can come up with."
That's just a small part of them. It certainly is a subject that many women have strong feelings on. In any case, the discussion did at least bring up links to lots of interesting blogs by women.
Personally, I don't see any lack of women expressing their opinions on political matters. I just see the men in control not paying attention because they just don't want to address the fundamental problems. Which are that this is a very sexist society, still very much a man's world, and that the men want to keep it that way since they benefit from it.
I mostly now read female bloggers, since I find them more interesting and less likely to merely engage in useless Bush-bashing and an endless cycles of attacks. Also because I believe that the most crucial issue of our times is the role of women. This is what's behind the Islamic extremist, the Christian fundamentalist, the Jewish ones and so much more.
I think the majority of so-called A-list male bloggers are incredibly boring as well as sexist. It's true that the majority of them deliberately don't link to most of the women, but mostly to other A-list males who in turn link back to them. It's a vicious circle, and the ladies are quite right to be upset about it.
permalink, posted by mike on Wednesday, February 23, 2005 at 12:14 PM
February 06, 2005
Visit the Bloggie nominees.
Courtesy of the folks at
Fairvue Central are the nominations for the
Fifth Annual Weblog Awards, aka the Bloggies. Voting is now closed, with the results to be announced in March.
The list of nominees always provides many interesting links. Such as
This Fish Needs A Bicycle, up for weblog of the year. ("A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle.")
South-East Asia Earthquake and Tsunami Blog is another one of the best weblog nominees, tho it seems to me a site that only began during the last week of the year doesn't quite fit the category.
Gothamist, centered on New York, is the other best blog nominee that I'd never heard of. (Didn't strike me as best blog material, but your mileage may vary.) The other two,
Wonkette and
Boing Boing, being old standards; and, while both are pretty good, also don't strike me as the best out of all of them. But what do I know?
permalink, posted by mike on Sunday, February 6, 2005 at 08:41 PM
February 01, 2005
Brass Crescent Awards.
City of Brass, a Muslim blogging center, has announced the winners of the
Brass Crescent Awards, which is for the best blogs in or on the Muslim community. Lots of interesting links there.
BEST BLOG:
Winner:
avari/nameh.
Honorable Mentions:
Abdusalaam Al-Hindi and
veiled4Allah.
BEST WRITING:
Winner:
Haroon Moghul(avari/nameh).
Honorable Mentions:
Thabet (Muslims Under Progress) and
Zack Ajmal (Procrastination).
BEST POST:
Winner:
Haroon Moghul (avari/nameh),
Explaining the Mideast to the Midwest.
Honorable Mention:
Abdusalaam Al-Hindi, Driving while menstruating
BEST SERIES:
Winner:
Leila M on Muharram.
Honorable Mention:
Zack Ajmal on Marriage.
BEST IRAQI BLOGGER:
Winner:
Riverbend (Baghdad Burning).
Honorable Mention:
Aunt Najma (A Star From Mosul).
BEST NON-ENGLISH BLOG:
Winner:
Asif Iqbal (Asif Iqbal's Multi-Lingual Blog).
Honorable Mention:
Zack Ajmal (Procrastination).
BEST GROUP BLOG:
Winner:
Muslims Under Progress.
Honorable Mention:
HU.
MOST DESERVING OF WIDER RECOGNITION:
Winner:
Chapati Mystery.
Honorable Mentions:
Ethnically Incorrect and
Mere Islam
BEST NON-MUSLIM BLOG:
Winner:
Juan Cole (Informed Comment).
Honorable Mention:
Abu Aardvark.
BEST NEW BLOG:
Winner:
Malo's Adventures.
Honorable Mention:
PakPositive.
BEST COMMENTER:
Winner:
Silent Spring.
Honorable Mention:
Al Muhajabah (veiled4Allah).
BEST THINKER:
Winner:
Silent Spring.
Honorable Mention:
Razib Khan.
BEST FEMALE BLOG:
Winner:
A Dervish's Du'a.
Honorable Mention:
Sister Scorpion.
Not surprised that Riverbend won the best Iraqi blog for Baghdad Burning. Incredible, heartfelt writing. Wish she could blog more than she does, but I'm amazed that without electricity, phones, water or heat that the Iraqis are able to do it at all. At least she speaks the truth. Here's a quote from some of her
posts on Fallujah.
People in Falloojeh are being murdered. The stories coming back are horrifying. People being shot in cold blood in the streets and being buried under tons of concrete and iron... where is the world? Bury Arafat and hurry up and pay attention to what's happening in Iraq.
They say the people have nothing to eat. No produce is going into the city and the water has been cut off for days and days. Do you know what it's like to have no clean water??? People are drinking contaminated water and coming down with diarrhoea and other diseases. There are corpses in the street because no one can risk leaving their home to bury people. Families are burying children and parents in the gardens of their homes. WHERE IS EVERYONE???
Furthermore, where is Sistani? Why isn't he saying anything about the situation? When the South was being attacked, Sunni clerics everywhere decried the attacks. Where is Sistani now, when people are looking to him for some reaction? The silence is deafening.
... It's typical American technique- every single atrocity is lost and covered up by blaming a specific person and getting it over with. What people don't understand is that the whole military is infested with these psychopaths. In this last year we've seen murderers, torturers and xenophobes running around in tanks and guns. I don't care what does it: I don't care if it's the tension, the fear, the 'enemy'… it's murder. We are occupied by murderers. We're under the same pressure, as Iraqis, except that we weren't trained for this situation, and yet we're all expected to be benevolent and understanding and, above all, grateful. I'm feeling sick, depressed and frightened. I don't know what to say anymore… they aren't humans and they don't deserve any compassion.
... Iraqis will never forgive this- never. It's outrageous- it's genocide and America, with the help and support of Allawi, is responsible. May whoever contributes to this see the sorrow, terror and misery of the people suffering in Falloojeh.
... Terror isn't just worrying about a plane hitting a skyscraper…terrorism is being caught in traffic and hearing the crack of an AK-47 a few meters away because the National Guard want to let an American humvee or Iraqi official through. Terror is watching your house being raided and knowing that the silliest thing might get you dragged away to Abu Ghraib where soldiers can torture, beat and kill. Terror is that first moment after a series of machine-gun shots, when you lift your head frantically to make sure your loved ones are still in one piece. Terror is trying to pick the shards of glass resulting from a nearby explosion out of the living-room couch and trying not to imagine what would have happened if a person had been sitting there.
The weapons (WMDs) never existed. It's like having a loved one sentenced to death for a crime they didn't commit- having your country burned and bombed beyond recognition, almost. Then, after two years of grieving for the lost people, and mourning the lost sovereignty, we're told we were innocent of harboring those weapons. We were never a threat to America...
Congratulations Bush- we are a threat now.
And this is from a woman who just 18 months ago was rather friendly towards the Americans. Things have changed.
permalink, posted by mike on Tuesday, February 1, 2005 at 03:41 PM
The Satan Pajama awards.
European weblog
Fistful of Euros has announced the winners of their first annual Satan Pajama awards. Besides the winners listed below, all of the finalists and their share of votes are on the
award page. There are a LOT of great blogs listed there.
Here are the winners of the 1st Annual European Weblog Awards, also known as the Satin Pajamas:
Best Weblog: The Glory of Carniola by Michael Manske. (From Slovakia. He, however, thinks
petite anglaise - lost in france should have won.)
Best Coverage of the EU: Publius by various.
Best Weblog From France: Journal d’un avocat by Eolas.
Best Weblog From Germany: Lyssas Lounge by Lyssa.
Best Political Weblog: Slugger O’Toole by Mick Fealty et al.
Best Non-European Weblog: One Good Thing by Leigh Anne Wilson.
Best New Weblog: Pestiside by Erik D’Amato et al.
Best Humorous Weblog: Sadly, No! by Seb.
Best Weblog Focused On A Single Country Or Region: The Glory of Carniola by Michael Manske.
Best Tech Weblog: thinking with my fingers by Torill Mortensen.
Best Weblog From the United Kingdom: perfect.co.uk by various.
Best Southeastern European Weblog: Histologion by Talos.
Best Personal Weblog: de bric et de blog by Veuve Tarquine.
Best CIS Weblog: Siberian Light by Andy.
Best Weblog By An Expatriate: Au Texas, tout le monde est fou sauf moi by Pasfolle.
Best Culture Weblog: Emmanuelle.net by Emmanuelle Richard.
Weblog Most Deserving of Wider Recognition: Non Tibi Spiro by Guy.
Best Writing: How to learn Swedish in 1000 difficult lessons by Francis Strand.
Fistful of Euros does a great job of following the European blogosphere and Europe in general. There are lots of links on their home page.
I like the European weblogs for the different perspective, and, of course, their almost always rather hysterical ideas about the US. But it always bothers me to come across these blogs written by people whose native language isn't English at all, yet almost always have better spelling, grammar and vocabulary than most of the American ones. The same thing with the Iraqi blogs. It's really frightening to realize just how low the literacy level in the states is getting.
permalink, posted by mike on Tuesday, February 1, 2005 at 01:21 PM
December 16, 2004
Guardian's best 100 web sites.
The
Guardian has published a roundup of a
hundred great web sites. It features the five best in twenty categories. It's a long list. Here are the Art and Reference sections:
Art
The Internet Movie Database is the sine qua non for anyone interested in film. Easily searchable and full of information about any movie, plot, director, actor or crew member you could think of; reliably accurate. For opera lovers, Opera Base is essential. Check future schedules of singers or directors and find details of opera houses or festivals. The National Gallery's website is wonderful: you can search the entire collection with ease. Abe Books is the best and biggest place to look for and buy secondhand and rare books. All Music is a comprehensive database on all musical genres. Great for checking discographies and the like.
us.imdb.com
www.operabase.com
www.nationalgallery.org.uk
www.abebooks.co.uk
www.allmusic.com
Reference
The web is often the quickest place to look something up - if you know where to go. If you don't, you can always start with Jim Martindale's Reference Desk, an astonishing collection that has been 10 years in the making. Usually, however, you will probably want to look up a word, a phone number, a place or whatever. For words, try Onelook, which indexes more than 6m words in 981 dictionaries. It also has a "reverse lookup" to find words from their meanings. For longer items, the Concise Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia is online (the Britannica costs money). There are links to the world's online phone books at Teldir, which is now on the Infobel site. Finally, there are maps of just about everywhere at Multimaps.
www.martindalecenter.com
www.onelook.com
www.multimaps.com
www.infobel.com/teldir
www.encyclopedia.com
I'd also have to add RefDesk,
www.refdesk.com, to the list. It's got everything and then some.
permalink, posted by mike on Thursday, December 16, 2004 at 12:35 PM
August 06, 2004
Blog Africa.
Via the Guardian's
weblog page is
Blog Africa, a new center for African blogs of all kinds. It's at
allafrica.com, a major African center. It's both a group blog and a
catalog of them. Quite interesting. In numerous languages.
permalink, posted by mike on Friday, August 6, 2004 at 11:17 AM
January 22, 2004
Carnival of the Canucks.
Reverend James Bow reviews the ever-growing Canadian blogosphere, at
Carnival of the Canucks VI, apparently the latest in an ongoing series. He says there are now 7,181 of them, a figure he gets from
Jim Elve's Blogs Canada. He doesn't review all of them, but quite a few. I see I'll have to make some additions to my blogroll.
permalink, posted by mike on Thursday, January 22, 2004 at 11:50 AM
January 21, 2004
Bloggies 2004 open for voting.
Every year the folks at
Fairvue Central host the annual Bloggies Awards, which attempt to pick the best weblogs from around the world in a number of categories.
This year's nominations have now been selected, based on users' recommendations, and are ready for voting.
On Monday, January 19, the finalists were announced and voting is open again to choose the winners. Voting will close at 10:00 PM EST on Saturday, January 31. The winners will be posted on Monday, March 15.
The Weblog Awards™ ceremony will be held at the South by Southwest Interactive Festival for the second time in Austin, Texas, USA on Monday, March 15 at 12:30 PM. Webloggers including previous winners and prize donators will present the certificates and prizes to those present.
Those who aren't attending may join the excitement on IRC, in #BlogIRC on irc.turlyming.com:6667. Winners will be announced live and a play-by-play of the ceremony will be given.
Even if you're not into voting, it's a great place to see which sites are garnering the most attention, and to find lots of interesting places to visit. Although some of them may not even be around anymore, the winners and nominees for
2001,
2002, and
2003 still make for some interesting browsing.
permalink, posted by mike on Wednesday, January 21, 2004 at 02:53 PM
January 19, 2004
Blogroll and links updated.
Finally updated and expanded the blogroll and link list on the home page. Added lots of new links of various kinds. Especially non-blogging related ones, such as news sources, various global organizations, the arts and so on. Along with some pithy comments about the increasing lack of objectivity and tolerance among so very many of the American sites. Just a personal opinion of course, but there you are.
permalink, posted by mike on Monday, January 19, 2004 at 12:13 PM
January 17, 2004
Blogging communities.
Via the always interesting
Burningbird, who's from Missouri, was a link to a page of
St. Louis bloggers. Which in turn had a list of different blogging communities. Mostly in the US, but one to Calgary in Albera, Canada, and one in London.
Austin, Texas.
Beltway Bloggers, Washington, DC.
Boston, Massachusetts.
Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Chicago, Illinois.
Dallas Ft. Worth, Texas.
Kansas City, Missouri.
London, England.
Los Angeles, California.
Madison, Wisconsin.
New York, New York.
Phoenix, Arizona.
San Diego, California.
Seattle, Washington.
St. Louis, Missouri.
Washington, DC.
Nothing from Oregon yet, where I live. But if you want links to Oregon stuff, bloggers and otherwise, try
The Oregon Blog. They're in Portland. I'm in Eugene. Must be more bloggers here, but I haven't found them yet.
permalink, posted by mike on Saturday, January 17, 2004 at 04:28 PM
January 15, 2004
List of Iraqi blogs.
Came across this new Iraqi blog,
Healing Iraq, written by a dentist there. Noticed he had a nice list of Iraqi blogs there, which I took and added to a bit. They'll all break your heart, but people should read them anyway. Some virulently anti-American, some pro-American, some in the middle.
But even the ones favorable to the US aren't at all happy with what the US military is doing these days. But they aren't happy about what the Islamic clergy is doing either, the latest development being the replacement of civil marriage laws by sharia, Islamic law. What a mess.
Curiously, all but one come courtesy of
Blogspot, so at least some Americans must be doing something right.
permalink, posted by mike on Thursday, January 15, 2004 at 03:21 PM
January 14, 2004
Margaret Cho's excellent blog.
Thought I'd point to
Margaret Cho's Blog which I find extremely interesting and well written. She has things to say, and no bones about saying them either. Frank and to the point.
It seems to me, and I could be mistaken, that most of the blogs are from white Americans, especially the so-called A-listers, and most seem fixated on this obsolete and irrelevant lefty-right nonsense. She, on the other hand, does a good job of expressing the viewpoint of the Asian-American, African-American, Hispanic-American and gay communities. Especially where they all come together, which they do quite a bit. Better than anyone else I can find
Her coverage of the recent MoveOn gathering,
Magical Night with MoveOn.org, cheered me up a bit. You won't read about it in the white-corporate controlled media, but there's a lot of action going on in the rest of America.
It is weird and chaotic to be at events like this. I wish I could take you all and show you how strange it is being around people you usually only see on tv. It's an alternate universe, feeling like stepping into the screen for a moment. I realize I have been around so long I know a lot of famous people, and it isn't a brag, I am just old and shit. Nobody seems to really hang out, and they all separate into either their own spaces to watch the shows, or disappear into their dressing rooms. This event had a lot more unity, there was a camaraderie between the artists that was more human, less VIP. We had a mission, to educate and to bring together disparate elements of our society that have much more in common than anyone realized. I hope that the contributions made by the major politicos and the monied liberals helps us to get that fucking shithead out of office.
Bush in 30 Seconds was a brilliant concept and the night was devoted to all the people who made ads on their computers, using their own money, their own hearts and minds, and most importantly, their right to free speech. It was the first time in a long while where I felt proud to be an American.
Best of all she's funny as hell. As you'd expect from a comedian. Check out her post,
Jobs and Economy Solution: Legalize Gay Marriage. That's hysterical. She's probably right though. All the gay marriages _would_ revitalize the florist industry. :)
permalink, posted by mike on Wednesday, January 14, 2004 at 08:09 PM
January 11, 2004
Teenage bloggers have their own world.
Fascinating article in this week's NY Times Magazine by Emily Nussbaum,
My So-Called Blog, on how blogging has become part of teen culture. Really amazing. I can't wait to see what happens when all of these kids grow up.
permalink, posted by mike on Sunday, January 11, 2004 at 01:20 PM
January 07, 2004
Top Canadian blogs.
Blogs Canada has a page of the
Top Canadian Blogs. There is also a list of the
Top Blogs - January 2004.
In case you were bored, or wanted to avoid discussions of the American election, which is already getting tiresome, and with nearly a whole year to go. Though I suppose even the Canadians are discussing it.
My personal favorite Canadian ones are the Vancouver-based
caterina.net, by a charming woman into art, poetry and such, and the place I found the link to Blogs Canada to begin with,
Wood s Lot, which is maybe the most consistently interesting, mentally stimulating and intellectually challenging site on the web. I always find something good to read there -- always. And you certainly can't say that about most sites, blogs or otherwise. There's a very long list of links there as well. May take a moment or two to load though, since they usually include a number of photos, paintings, lengthy poems and such. But it's worth it.
permalink, posted by mike on Wednesday, January 7, 2004 at 09:33 PM
January 05, 2004
2003 Koufax Awards.
The folks at
Wampum are having a competition to choose the
2003 Koufax Awards, what they consider the best "lefty" blogs of the year. I don't really understand what a "lefty" is, or how they can distinguish those from others, unless it's simply Bush-bashing, but it's worth checking out.
One of the categories is for
Best Post of 2003. Their list of nominations, selected by their readers, makes for some interesting reading on a variety of topics.
Their list of nominees for
Best Blog is also probably worth checking out. Heck, here's the complete list of them. I don't agree with a lot of their politics, but I have to agree that they're probably the best of the bunch, and it's convenient to have all of the links together.
The other category is
Best Single Issue Blog.
I really must add at least some of these to my blogroll, although a few of them are already there.
Again, this does not constitute any sort of endorsement of the views expressed on these sites, especially all of the Bush-bashing. I dislike Bush as much as anyone, but corporate America was quite corrupt before he came along, and the Democrats are as much to blame as the Republicans, as far as I can see. Enron, WorldCom, et al, for example, all happened on Clinton-Gore's watch, not Bushes.
And as far as the Democrats being a party of "peace", I can only point out that they were in charge during World War I, World War II, the Korean War, the Vietnam War and peacemonger Carter's dirty little Central American wars. Both parties are warmongers deluxe, and history would suggest that either party will get us into a great big ugly war.
I don't want to be that criticial since I believe their hearts are in the right place, and that they mean well, but they're not seeing the whole picture or dealing with the real problems, which run much, much deeper than the current Republican idiocies.
The word "protest" combines "pro" (to be in favor of something, as in "pro and con"), and "testify" (to stand up for something). Popular mythology notwithstanding, it doesn't mean to be AGAINST something, but to be FOR something. We all know what they're against. But what are they for? Until they figure that out all of the moaning and groaning will accomplish absolutely nothing. In fact it will make it worse since it just lets this corrupt system continue on and on and on. To think that Sheriff Dean will ride into Dodge and clean out the bad guys, and that everything will be fine is utterly ridiculous, to put it mildly. Ain't going to happen. Not this year, not next year, not ever.
permalink, posted by mike on Monday, January 5, 2004 at 08:02 PM
December 19, 2003
Thanks to Userland for the blog-friendly links.
Dave Winer, long-time purveyor of
Scripting News, and founder of
Userland, has somehow persuaded the NY Times to allow bloggers to create special links to articles, links that continue to work even after they've entered the pay archives.
There's a special page that you can go to at the Times to create these links, which is
here. And you don't even have to use a Userland blogging product, such as
Radio Userland or
Manila to take advantage of it. At least not yet. That's great.
I disagree with a lot of what Dave says. But I have to give credit where credit is due. This is a very nice and useful thing he, along with the Times themselves, have done which really helps blogging. He must have done some serious talking. I wonder if he's paying for this. There must have been some tit-for-tat involved. Or maybe the Times just sees the benefit in having people link to their articles. After all, you do have to go to their site to see them, which can only help them.
I still prefer linking to the
Guardian and the
Scotsman though, than the
NY Times, since they don't hide their articles behind a money wall. They seem to be doing rather well without having to resort to this, which makes me wonder why the NY Times can't also afford to do so.
I'm also curious. Do many people really spend the money to purchase older articles? I never have, both because, quite frankly, I don't think the quality of their reporting justifies it, and because I think they're still way too expensive. Maybe if they made it less than a dollar, and made it easy to pay small amounts, but so far they haven't.
permalink, posted by mike on Friday, December 19, 2003 at 12:14 PM
December 18, 2003
Best of British blogging 2003.
It's the "best of the year" time, and the
Guardian has announced its choices for the Best of British Blogging 2003. The
article on it is here, and the
full list of blogs itself is here. Haven't had the chance to check out many of them yet, but it looks like a lot of interesting links.
All the blogs mentioned here are exceptional. They are a testament to the growing richness of British blogging. They demonstrate great design, good writing and smart use of links to provide a series of windows on worlds we would otherwise never know about. This was exactly the intention of the awards when we first began them in 2002.
The Guardian is one of the few major news sites that has really gotten on the blog bandwagon. Their own weblogs are
here and
here. For more, see their
special report on blogging, an ongoing section with the latest develoments.
permalink, posted by mike on Thursday, December 18, 2003 at 11:21 AM
December 16, 2003
Asia weblog awards 2003.
Via
Metafilter is this weblog,
Flying Chair, which is running a contest for
the Best Asian Weblogs of 2003. You can vote on the best of various countries and categories, until December 28, or just peruse the many interesting links. It's amazing what a global phenomenon this has become.
permalink, posted by mike on Tuesday, December 16, 2003 at 03:49 PM
Weblogs comments spam getting out of hand.
Caterina over at
caterina.net reports that she had to spend hours removing over 400 spam comments from her weblog. And that she's getting so frustrated with it she might even shut down her weblog. Which sure would be a shame, since she has a lot to say.
Link here, the comments of which contain some useful advice in dealing with it.
I deleted, by hand, over 400 comment spams yesterday. I spent about three hours yesterday removing the spam, and then trying to solve the problem. I already tried installing Jay Allen's Moveable Type blacklist plug-in when it was first released. It will not install on my server. I get a server error when I try to configure it, and have not been able to fix it.
I am going to shut this site down if this continues, and, barring some technological breakthrough, it will. I don't have the time to keep purging this crap. I'm thoroughly disgusted. I'll go back to pen and paper. I will, damn it. I will.
This is horrible. "Spam comments" are a special type of spam that are inserted into the comments of individual weblog posts. There are utilities being made available to help block these, but it still is a serious problem. And illustrates the very real danger that spamming and other anti-social activities could really destroy the internet's potential as a forum for open discussion.
I really want to have comments on this site, which seems to me to be the real purpose of having a weblog. It's nice to express my own views, but it's the dialogue that ensues that really interests me. But, like her, I really don't have the time or technological expertise to deal with it all. I already spend way too much time deleting spam from my email as it is. There's got to be a way to stop this. Just has to be.
permalink, posted by mike on Tuesday, December 16, 2003 at 12:01 PM
September 19, 2003
2003 Bloggie awards.
If you want to check out some interesting blogs try the
2003 Bloggies, the 3rd annual awards given in 30 categories. All selected by public nomination and voting. Also check out the awards from previous years; most of those blogs are still around. Courtesy of
Fairvue Central. These came out a while ago, but the links are still interesting.
Weblog of the year is
little. yellow. different. I'm not sure I see why, but there you are. A personal favorite is
weblog wannabe, winner of the Best Asian Weblog all three years. I don't agree with most of these choices, but I do with that one. Here's a great quote I just found on her site.
"Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things you didn’t do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover." --Mark Twain
He's quite right of course. People are always talking about the trials and tribulations of choosing a career as an artist, actor or anything else creative. But I don't think I've ever heard anyone express regret about that choice. Regrets about not being able to "make it" (whatever that is), or such. But not about trying. Not even once. Sure have heard lots and lots of people express regrets about choosing business careers, or about spending their whole lives working the same job. Beginning with my grandfather.
permalink, posted by mike on Friday, September 19, 2003 at 03:39 PM
September 18, 2003
The Guardian's experiment in combining news and blogging.
The
Guardian reports on its experimental use of blogs in covering the recent WTO fiasco. They have been using blogs to supplement their coverage, and to see if using blogs to focus on a particular issue could have any difference.
On a more trivial level, the end of the talks also marked the end - or at least the end of the first stage - of a Guardian experiment to link editorial comment with the emerging world of "blogging", or online journals on the internet.
It began on July 10 with a casual remark at the end of an economic dispatch suggesting that that there should be a web campaign to abolish all agricultural subsidies, possibly called something like kickAAS (kick all agricultural subsidies).
Following a large number of supportive emails (as well as a few abusive ones), we set up a blog, launching it on the same day as a Guardian editorial on the same subject. The editorial contained a link to the website.
Thanks to the leverage now commanded Guardian Unlimited's impressive global reach, this was read by a lot of concerned people around the world.
One of the reasons for the attention that it got could have been the novelty of a "serious" blog with a dedicated political purpose. This was at a time when Blogdom was wondering whether blogs could be use for serious, non navel-gazing purposes.
KickAAS was, of course, a predictable failure, and it had no effect at all on the Cancun talks. However, it brought people of all political persuasions from around the world together to discuss policy and tactics.
In this way, it may have raised awareness about the potential of blogs to further a cause, but there clearly needs to be a long term-strategy, as well as a tactical website, in place.
I don't feel it was a "failure" at all. On the contrary, it was a useful first step towards a new and better form of reporting, and a new and better form of social activism. If it was a "failure" it was only because they set up unrealistic expectations. Did they really expect that a few weeks of blogging would have that much effect, and that things would change overnight?
I like the way the Guardian is both reporting on blogs and using them themselves, but they still seem to have this elitist bias towards them. The term "navel-watching" says it all.
permalink, posted by mike on Thursday, September 18, 2003 at 09:12 AM
August 14, 2003
Lazy Guide to Net Culture: Random personal pictures.
Via the
Scotsman, and a good example of why it's one of my favorite sites, is this ongoing series,
Lazy Guide to Net Culture.
This one focues on people's personal pictures. Quotes by Stewart Kirkpatrick.
If you want to appear like you’re at the cutting edge of net culture but can’t be bothered to spend hours online, then never fear. Scotsman.com’s pathetic team of geeks, freaks and gimps will do the hard work for you. While you sip wine, read a book or engage in normal social interaction, they will burn out their retinas staring at badly designed web pages and dodge creeps in chatrooms to prepare for you: Scotsman.com’s lazy guide to net culture.
... Personal photos have fuelled the next evolutionary stage in blogging: photoblogs. These are, as the name suggests, online journals illustrated with pictures. (OK, it's not the most earth-shaking innovation but it is proving very popular.)
Photoblogs.org contains a list of fairly decent examples.
Even we at scotsman.com have succumbed and have an Edinburgh Festivals photoblog
here.
Quite a few more links there. Even better are these random picture generators.
By far the best use of personal pictures on the internet can be found at
diddly.com/random.
Dave Mattson's Random Personal Picture Finder generates random numbers and puts them in the default filename structure of some makes of digital cameras. It then runs these through a
Google image search.
The result is a page full of pictures with those filenames (because they were taken by a digital camera and put online without the filename being changed). They are pulled from people's websites across the world.
If you want, you can click on the images to see the different website where they appear. But the point of the Random Personal Picture Finder is that it misses out the middleman completely. Instead of having to wade through commentary, personal recollections and an account of what Tiddles had for breakfast you can just look at what pictures are being put online.
Warning: you can waste a lot of time looking at these. I've resisted for the most part so far, but there are some talented people out there.
Luckily I don't have a digital camera yet, or I'd be doing it myself. I've seen a lot of beautiful country lately. It'd be nice to wander around and take photos and put them up. Pretty soon it'll be possible to do it entirely wireless from almost anywhere.
A couple sites they don't mention, but which are two of my favorites for photos are:
burningbird.net, from the American midwest, I think, and
Andrea's site, from Germany.
Add: Just checked out photoblogs.org a little. Like I say, you could waste a lot of time, they have a LOT. The first one I tried,
George Bailey's Nature Images, was beautiful. Incredible colors. So is this one,
Digiteyesed Photography, by Sean David McCormick.
I can't believe some of these photo sites. I've done some sites, and it takes a lot to build sites of this kind of complexity, especially involving lots of graphics that must load quickly. Impressive. And photographers seem to possess the ability to focus on detail that also makes great sites.
permalink, posted by mike on Thursday, August 14, 2003 at 02:17 PM
Guardian's Onlineblog
The
Guardian seems to be the first major paper to really get on the blogging phenomenon. Besides their regular
weblog page they have a separate
Onlineblog where they cover blogging and related issues. Pretty nice page and links as well.
Here's some interesting comments on blogging itself.
Right: first, the technology’s reason for existing is a Good Thing: it’s letting people express themselves on the web more easily. I think freedom of expression is important. To argue against something that allows such expression, by removing the very real barriers to entry of coding and designing and FTPing and the rest, is a lot like arguing against freedom of speech (as Jack has said here before). When people bash these websites, what they are often saying is that such freedom should only be granted to those who meet their criteria as interesting, or literate, or clever.
Second, if what some people produce using this new-found freedom isn't very good, how much does it matter? On the web, there's an unlimited amount of space to hold all this stuff. Don't like what you see? Move on. It’s all pretty democratic. People don’t need to visit your page. And unlike TV, radio or newsprint, you’re not filling airwaves, or newsprint, that could be better used in another way.
permalink, posted by mike on Thursday, August 14, 2003 at 08:36 AM
July 31, 2003
How much should I blog the wars?
Can't decide how much I want/should talk about the mess in Iraq, or the other American wars going on. I know there are a lot of people blogging it a lot, and lots of reports about it. But at the same time it really seems as though most people aren't really aware of what's going on. Polls show that a significant percentage of Americans really believe that WMDs were used by Iraq during the initial part of the war, not to mention possessing them at all. So I guess it's worthwhile to report on it some.
But it sure is boring and tiresome. And not really what I want to blog about. I want to focus more on writing, history, art and literature, and things like that. Be a more general purpose blog than a political one. More like the extraordinary
Wood s Lot, which is a marvelous source of creative input. Perhaps a bit too cerebral, but that's the general idea.
Still the war is part of history and I guess I'll continue to link to interesting articles on it. Perhaps what I think may be more accurate and objective reports about it from media free of American control. Such as the
Guardian and Observer family and the
Scotsman, which I think are pretty good. And
Asia Times, they're very thorough.
Once in a while I might also mention that the US is heavily entrenched in an ongoing and growing war in Columbia and neighboring countries, a real mess with just as extensive loss of life as in Iraq, that no one ever seems to mention. Did you know that Coca-Cola has full-on private armies down there fighting labor unions? Do a google for coca-cola and columbia sometimes. Amazing things going on.
But there's a lot going on in the world besides war. I think a lot of people like to focus on them to distract attention from things perhaps a bit closer to home, or more difficult to confront. Certainly the American government since 911 has been very successful in using "terrorism" as a way of avoiding domestic difficulties, and plenty of Americans are willing to go along with it. You'd almost never think that it all stems from one single incident lasting less than two hours nearly two years ago. Just one incident. Hardly enough to call a battle, much less a war.
permalink, posted by mike on Thursday, July 31, 2003 at 08:46 PM
Amazed at the effort behind a web site.
After transferring everything over, and redesigning the sites and such, I'm again amazed at just how much work and time-consuming details are involved in getting a good-sized site up. Goodness. It just eats up the time.
I guess it's worse for me since I'm an eternal perfectionist and can futz forever, but even so it's a real challenge. Trying to deal with PERL, PHP, mySQL, MovableType, the browsers, Mac and Windows, mail settings, domain name stuff, nameservers, and on and on and on.
I don't think I'm going to be redoing this one for quite a while. Will add on to it, but I think I'm going to let well enough alone.
I must say that the software is starting to get very good and even well documented.
Movable Type is very well done, and with good documentation and online support as well. So is the forum software,
Invision Power Board. My new domain hosts,
ipowerweb.com are also pretty good, with extensive user control over the settings and good help. I'd recommend any of them. I also use
easyDNS.com for domain name management. They're really good as well.
permalink, posted by mike on Thursday, July 31, 2003 at 11:43 AM
July 30, 2003
I keep forgetting the categories.
Movable Type allows one to assign categories, even multiple ones, to each entry. a feature that Blogger didn't have, and one I've really wanted. It allows you to organize and arrange entries in an unlimited number of ways. Especially since you can have multiple ones. That makes all of the difference.
Warning, though. I still have to go back through and assign categories to most of the entries I imported into this new setup. Most of them are just labeled general. If you select the general category listing, you'll get a huge file.
But I'll fix that soon. It will take some thought though. Have to define and set up the categories first, and then go through and assign them. It also takes keywords, which is also great, and which also opens up new possibilities.
But keying and categorizing aren't that easy. For instance, where does Bob Hope go? Film, music, entertainment, art, theatre? Lots of choices. And most of all, as the title indicates, you have to remember to assign them on each entry.
I actually forgot to do that for this entry. Ha. :)
permalink, posted by mike on Wednesday, July 30, 2003 at 10:51 AM
OK, back to blogging.
OK, good, it felt good to make that first real post in this new site. I've been moving my blog from Blogger to Movable Type, and also moving my domains to another server. And reconceiving the whole site arrangement while I'm at it. Mainly because Movable Type is an awesome program, and it allows me to tie things together in a way I've never been able to do before. Really great.
I think the new site(s) are up and running well now. Still a few glitches with email at the new server. If mail to galileolibrary.com doesn't get through, try presky@yahoo.com. But I'm real happy with the new arrangement itself, and it's basically finished. Lots of room to add on things but ready to go. It should be pretty simple to operate. You can view the blog entries individually, or by the day, week or month. Hopefully it's self-explanatory.
What I've done is centered the different sites I had, my personal site, my weblog, the library, the world history and so on into the Galileo Library. So that's the weblog now, which in turn contains direct links to the history readings and all of the other stuff. This allows me to comment on and link to various things. And integrates better with the writer's services business I'm doing now.
So go to galileolibrary.com for my weblog now, and to find out what's up in general. It used to be newpajamas.com, but I think Galileo Library is more generic, and better expresses what it is. I see a whole new way to link the blog to my ebooks and readings now. The newpajamas.com link will still work though. I do like the name. :)
permalink, posted by mike on Wednesday, July 30, 2003 at 10:22 AM
July 07, 2003
New weblog and library
Welcome to this new melding of my weblog (formerly New Pajamas), home site and online library, now featuring
Movable Type, which is an incredible program.
After working with it I realized that it allowed me to combine everything into a new and much better way. The weblog IS the library, and the library IS the weblog now. This probably won't make sense yet to most of you, but you'll see. But look how the history readings are listed on this page now, down
below the most recent entries.
There is still a lot of work to do on it, and it will be changing over the next few weeks, especially the organization of permalinks and the archives in general, so don't bookmark anything yet. I'm reorganizing all of my sites and domains, so things will be in flux a bit.
permalink, posted by mike on Monday, July 7, 2003 at 09:30 AM
June 21, 2003
Blogging is good for your vocabulary.
I was looking through the referrer logs, and the phrases people used that brought them here, and it occurred to me that one way to drive traffic here is to use as many different words as possible. Finally, a chance to use all of those big words I know. The more different terms you use, the more likely you'll have one people are searching for.
And, moreover, you'll draw the folks who use the same words you do. So simply by typing the words whimsical and effervescent and delicious, I end up drawing the attention of people who are whimsical, effervescent and delicious. (Nobody who wasn't themselves rather whimsical would search for the word whimsical, right?) What an idea.
permalink, posted by mike on Saturday, June 21, 2003 at 11:39 AM
June 20, 2003
The Disease.
Liberal Arts Media explains why he stopped blogging, claims he just can't take it any more. Via
Booknotes.
And let©–s face it, the DISEASE is everywhere ú it©–s on National Plutocratic Radio fer gawds sake, it©–s in the local mullet wrapper they dare to call a newspaper, it©–s on the radio, it©–s on TV, and it©–s in the news. It©–s everywhere on the news.
We have the worst President ever in the history of the United States of America. He©–s a war criminal, for crying out loud. He is also responsible for the most idealistic, hypocritical, empty-headed, and incompetent administration in the history of this great country. He plans a war but never plans an occupation. He has to bribe Ethiopia and Eritrea to join the ©¯Coalition of the Willing©— ú so he can claim he has international support. Now his administration is pushing Japan to remilitarize so he can have Japanese peace-keepers in Iraq, because, gosh, you know those American voters won©–t stand to have a couple of hundred thousand American troops stationed in Iraq. And he©–s deployed two thirds of the entire military oversees in Iraq and Afghanistan and now he©–s threatening Iran. And wait a f****** minute, he wants Japan to have a standing army!
The DISEASE is everywhere. It is worse than SARS, scarier than monkeypox (which hit Ohio, not France, by the [bleep] way), and more pertinent to the substance of America than Laci Paterson or is it Peterson©–s bloody awful death will ever be.
So I©–m sorry to my friends who came to rely on me. I may eventually get back to posting news. But right now my RAGE is beyond def con five. Right now I©–m in a life and death struggle with the DISEASE.
Boy, Bush is really, really starting to get to people. Good. Rage is what we need, along with the realization that this needs to be confronted and dealt with once and for all. Unfortunately, turning it off and walking away is not an option. Too many people, mostly children, are dying. Walking away is what the apathetic, unpatriotic voting minority does, and look at the horrific consequences of that. Time for people to face reality. I guess he's rather young, this guy. Has to learn to turn the fury into vision and see the big picture, and the long term.
For more reality, also via Booknotes, via
Working for Change, is Molly Ivins' latest,
The Great Iraqi Gold Rush.
My, my, my, the great Iraqi Gold Rush is on, and who should be there at the front of the line, right along with Halliburton and Bechtel, but our old friends at WorldCom, perpetrator of the largest accounting fraud in American history.
WorldCom, shortly to become MCI, has been given a contract worth $45 million in the short term to build a wireless phone network in Iraq. I learned via The Associated Press that Washington Technology, a trade newspaper that follows computing-related sales to the U.S. government, "found WorldCom jumped to eighth among all federal technology contractors in 2002, with $772 million in government sales." And that is only counting the deals in which WorldCom is the primary contractor. It is actually getting much more as a subcontractor.
The Securities and Exchange Commission recently reached a settlement with WorldCom, fining the company $500 million for its $11 billion defrauding of investors. The company did not have to admit any guilt. "The $500 million is in a sense laundered by the taxpayers," Tom Schatz, president of Citizens Against Government Waste, told AP.
WorldCom got the Iraq contract without competitive bidding, to the anger of rival companies AT&T, Sprint, etc., which actually have experience in building wireless networks, according to the AP. A WorldCom spokesman "also stressed the company's deep, overall relationship with the U.S. military and government."
Yes, all very true. But again, we already know they're corrupt and violent. Endlessly repeating this is not going to accomplish anything. What are you going to do about it?
Oh, and if you didn't already know, WorldCom is trying to hide its past by changing its name to MCI. That won't work. Or will it?
[BEGIN RANT. If I'm going to link to them, common decency forces me to warn of certain biases of the folks at Working for Change, as with most of what used to be called the "progressive" community, in particular the anti-Semitic bias of some of the people who write for them. They may mean well, but like the corporate media they always criticize, they also have no hesitation in just lying or making up facts when it suits their purposes.
They do so regularly when it comes to Israel, in particular perpetuating this delusion that Israel is a puppet of the US. It doesn't take much intelligence to realize how absurd it is to suggest that Jews would make an alliance with fanatical Christians who believe that God wants them to eliminate all non-Christians from the world, or that they could ever share the same goals. It simply doesn't make any sense, and no reputable publication would publish such a theory. As I keep saying, and will continue to say, the US and the UK are the largest suppliers of arms to the Arab nations, it's their oil money that funds Islamic terrorism and suicide bombers, and their banks and financial institutions that allow them to function. The Christian Conservatives, the neo-cons, hate Jews and are Israel's enemies, and Jews should never forget that.
So please take what the leftist media say with quite a few grains of salt, same as the rightists. People who distort one kind of information will distort others. There's more than one kind of disease infecting this planet. And if the Democrats want to have any hope of getting Bush out of the White House, they have to confront this reality, and assure people that they will not take the side of terrorists. The Palestinians danced in the streets on 9/11, the American people haven't forgotten that, and won't vote for people who advocate giving the Palestinians a state that will allow them to have control of an airport that can ship suicide bombers all over the world. No matter how much they hate the Republicans. END RANT.
(Rant inspired by this
article there, which to me is just blatant Jew-hating.)]
permalink, posted by mike on Friday, June 20, 2003 at 10:30 AM
British blogs.
The Guardian has a
special blogging section now. Among other things there is a fascinating list of
UK weblogs. Here are a few that sound rather interesting.
Diary of a Glitter-Splashed Britney-Loving Lesbo
Linkless navel-gazing by a '22-year-old butcheyfemme queer with rubbish on her mind and sparkles everywhere else'. Strangely readable.
Donkey on the Edge
Whimsical personal/tech blog by London-based designer Dug Falby.
Entelechy
Journal/weblog by Radhika Nair, an Indian living in the UK. Intelligent and direct.
Imperial Doughnut
'A ring-shaped cake made of rich, light dough that is fried in deep fat and manufactured for consumption by minions of the evil Galactic Empire.' Nice weblog too.
Many more listed, not just from the UK either.
permalink, posted by mike on Friday, June 20, 2003 at 08:55 AM
June 16, 2003
Iranian weblogs.
A weblog from an Iranian student,
Notes of an Iranian girl, reporting on the recent protests there.
Anyway, Tehran was somehow calm last night but some serious battles have started in other cities like Ahvaz & people of Azerbaijan have also some plans....& generally the support of Police has been great, actually they never do anything against people & all that violence is from Basijis & members of Allah's group, that have no special uniform but you can recognize them from the dirty appearance & their hateful bear & way of wearing...
I also heard that yesterday in one of Northern streets girls took off their veils & started chanting & policemen were even encouraging others to join them!
Which also leads to
Mashregh.com, a "Community Weblog for Persians". Curious that they're starting to call themselves Persians again.
The idea for a Community Weblog in English for Persians or people interested in Iran related affairs, came after seeing the Great "Don" Hoder's community weblog in Farsi called
Sobhaneh and also the
Siah Sepid Community Weblog , all of which I read avidly every day!
With Iran being back on the headlines, and the enormous amount of information being distributed daily on the Internet, I felt I could help by gathering and organizing some of this info by creating a community weblog in English , and inviting a select group of bloggers and writers to post their links and comments in one place.
Some in English, some in Persian. At least they're maintaining their sense of humor. ""You say totalitarianism, we say monarchy, let's call the whole thing off."
And enjoy this bit of fashion history.
"The look is Audrey Hepburn on a day out, with a chic scarf wrapped under the chin and a pair of trendy shades. It's all the rage for young women in Iran and a headache for the conservative defenders of an Islamic dress code. "
permalink, posted by mike on Monday, June 16, 2003 at 09:19 AM
June 13, 2003
Best of the female bloggers.
The Rittenhouse Review has a nice overview of the
best of the women bloggers. I've heard of some of them but not all.
BTW, a minor point of grammar. It shouldn't be "women" bloggers, women not being an adjective. It should be "female" bloggers, or perhaps, "women who blog."
permalink, posted by mike on Friday, June 13, 2003 at 08:15 PM
Why am I blogging about politics?
I have no idea actually. I don't even like politics. I guess it's part of the post-911 thing, and wanting to take part of this dialogue. But I think it's mostly just tracking history in the making that interests me. I really don't even think politics matters that much. It just reflects social and other changes really. A lot of people think it's the government that changes society, but it's the other way around. That's why looking to the government for solutions rarely works. The government can only implement ideas that people think of first.
permalink, posted by mike on Friday, June 13, 2003 at 07:37 PM
June 04, 2003
What is a weblog?
Russ Lipton writes on what makes a weblog. "A weblog is just a web site organized by time," he says. I can't say I entirely agree with that. Wouldn't that also apply to newspapers, magazines and anything else that's updated on a regular basis?
I think a weblog is anything the blogger wants it to be. There are no rules here.
I'm also not sure that the reverse chronological order is always the best approach. At least not for everybody. For me blogging is a journey, and it might just make more sense to someone else if they follow my path as I took it, rather than retracing my steps. It certainly makes it more difficult for someone to follow a train of thought that's continued over time. I often add updates or further comments to earlier posts, current blogging software offers no way to track these.
I also think that comments are an important part of it. The difference between blogs and newspapers is that people can respond to your opinions and thoughts. (Yes, I know I don't have comments yet. But I will as soon as I move to Moveable Type, probably within the next month or so. In the meantime you can comment in the
discussion forums I've set up.)
permalink, posted by mike on Wednesday, June 4, 2003 at 11:01 AM
May 27, 2003
View this blog with wood borders, or not.
This site is designed so you can view the pages
in their own window, or with various framesets. Try this simple one with
wood and colored borders, that's my favorite.
There are also sets with links in a separate frame on the
left, or on the
right. There's not much in the side panels right now, but eventually it'll have archives links, blogroll and who knows what.
Note: if you're reading this in one of the archive pages, it will go back to the home page. One of these days I'll do the Javascript thingie to make it open with the current page.
I usually set the default to the blog page itself, since you get so much flack for using frames from the bozos in the web world, but it could be different when you read this. You can bookmark any frame set you want. View choices are usually at the
bottom of pages, sometimes at the top.
The framesets can also be shared by the other sites in this so-called Galileo community of mine.
You can get out of any frameset by selecting
no frames at the
top or
bottom of most pages. Or by using your browser's popup menu, control or right-click, to 'Open Frame in New Window'.
permalink, posted by mike on Tuesday, May 27, 2003 at 06:50 PM
May 25, 2003
Photo blogs become mainstream.
The NY Times has an article,
Prospecting for Gold Among the Photo Blogs, discussing this new type of blogging. Lots of good links, although for some reason they don't make them active links.
Click enough and you will be rewarded. On
www.slower.net, Eliot Shepard's site, you can find a glowing red portrait of Porky Pig in a fire hat and an abstract shot of a red, white and blue floor.
Www.fotolog.net/alphabet is devoted to found alphabets, objects resembling letters; it shows a toilet roll and holder that looks like a Q. On
www.hirmes.com/ice, the photographer travels to the center of spherical ice forms and sends back pictures that look like new galaxies.
I started my adventures in the land of the photo blogs at a Web site announcing the winners of an online contest: the 2003 Photobloggies, sponsored by
www.photojunkie.org. The 14 winners in 14 categories had all posted photo diaries on a regular basis in 2002.
Have you ever noticed that the major news sites rarely, if ever, put in active links to the sites they discuss? (I've added the links to the sites quoted. There are many more in the article.)
I don't know why this is. Could be the legal issues, but I suspect it's that they still simply don't "get" hypermedia. Probably the same reason most of them don't allow their articles to be searched by the search engines. I guess they still basically think of the web as just an electronic version of paper, not realizing that it's an entire different way of looking at things.
I've been thinking of adding a special section of photo blogs to my blogroll. One of these days.
permalink, posted by mike on Sunday, May 25, 2003 at 03:50 PM
May 17, 2003
No comments here yet.
I don't have any comment facility here yet, mostly since Blogger doesn't have them. After a bit I'll move to Moveable Type or some other program that has all of the bells and whistles. In the meantime, if you want to comment on something, please go to the
Galileo Community site, where there are
discussion forums for your enjoyment. No one's been there yet, but that just means you could be the first. I think it's probably better to put comments there anyway, since discussions attached to each post usually get lost in the shuffle of time.
permalink, posted by mike on Saturday, May 17, 2003 at 02:45 PM
If you have nothing to do, you can do it here.
The dullest blog in the world. There's absolutely nothing there, but that doesn't stop hundreds of people from commenting on it. Here's a sample entry.
Earlier on I heard something that I wanted to remember. I found a pen and wrote it down on a piece of paper. If I need to be reminded of the information at any point I will find the piece of paper and read it.
116 comments on this so far. I wonder how many comments I'd get if I simply wrote: "Get a life!" It's part of the
wiblog.com community of "wibsites" located somewhere in the UK, most of which seem to be equally silly.
permalink, posted by mike on Saturday, May 17, 2003 at 02:19 PM
Sharing your site with RSS.
Jason Cook offers up a
quick guide to using RSS to publish your site.
Have you ever noticed those inviting orange buttons on some Web pages, or spotted the odd link pitching an "RSS feed"? If you've ever clicked one out of curiosity, and then scratched your head at the unformatted gobbledygook in your web browser, you've seen an RSS file.
What is it really for, anyway? Two things: RSS (Really Simple Syndication) is an easy way for sites to share headlines and stories so that other sites can integrate them into their pages. Additionally, some savvy surfers use special RSS aggregators Ð kind of like mini-browsers Ð to speedily flip through the latest news and links from dozens of sites.
In other words, Web builders use RSS to dish out and bring in fresh news and content on their websites, just like the big portals. And Web surfers can use RSS applications to collect custom-tailored selections of their favorite websites to be read at their leisure.
I don't have RSS working on this blog yet. And frankly, don't have much interest in it. I suppose I will soon, just so any prospective clients can see I know how to do it, but for some reason it doesn't excite me. Mostly it just seems to me to be the same stories linked over and over, or the same group of people linking to themselves. But maybe I'm missing something. It IS interesting technology, that's for sure. But I suspect most of these people just like the technology for technology's sake, not because it is particularly useful.
permalink, posted by mike on Saturday, May 17, 2003 at 11:18 AM
May 15, 2003
Alas, a blog.
Cartoonist B. Deutsch, creator of
Ampersand has a
marvelous blog to go along with the great art. What I wouldn't give to be able to draw this well.
permalink, posted by mike on Thursday, May 15, 2003 at 04:59 PM
Lots of blogs at Blogcount.
Blogcount is a site that attempts to count and otherwise keep track of the size of the blogosphere. I'm not much interested in the count per se, but they also break them down by languages, so there are lots of links to blogs from all around the world.
Via and hosted by
Phil Wolff's always interesting
dijest.com community.
permalink, posted by mike on Thursday, May 15, 2003 at 02:02 PM
New version of Blogger.
A new version of Blogger is out, tho I gather it's still being tested and refined. It's called "Dano". More info
here. Lots of new features and they fixed archiving. Great.
permalink, posted by mike on Thursday, May 15, 2003 at 12:22 PM
May 14, 2003
Can't decide whether or not.
Can't decide whether or not to always use a heading for entries. Most of the time it looks better, but a lot of the time it's not really necessary. I want to be free to make quick notes and comments on little things. Let's see how this one looks without a heading.
permalink, posted by mike on Wednesday, May 14, 2003 at 08:42 PM
May 13, 2003
OK, I'm back.
Well it took a while, but I think I'm going to give this blogging thing another shot. Didn't hardly touch a computer all winter, and since then haven't been able to get myself going again. Reluctance to open myself up I guess.
But going to try again. Lots of things in the world I want to comment on. Should be fun. Have moved back to Santa Barbara, where I lived most of the seventies and eighties, and early nineties, and am now settled in a wonderful new house and able to focus a bit more.
Hard to know where to begin. There are so many things happening in the world these days. Maybe I'll start with a list of some topics I want to write on: devolution, deflation, the Euro, America, web design, the problem with ebooks, literary agency, the left, the right, and I guess, the so-called silent majority as well. Well that should be enough to start.
permalink, posted by mike on Tuesday, May 13, 2003 at 06:21 PM
End of entries.