Mike Presky's weblog : category archive : American culture

Home   Galileo Library   World History   Links   Art Gallery   Services
 




February 20, 2007


Randy Newman - A few words in defense of our country.

Found this great new video by Randy Newman. Some pointed political comments by someone with a style all his own.




This made me think of another old Randy Newman song, "Let's Drop the Big One." Found it on YouTube where someone had made an anti-American video of it. Don't miss the snippet at the end.




 permanent link image permalink, posted by mike on Tuesday, February 20, 2007 at 11:58 AM



February 15, 2007


Constant rape in America's prisons.

The problem of rape in America's massive gulag of prisons, detention centers and concentration camps continues to worse. It's not just at Baghram or Abu Ghraib or outside the country. The worst of it is inside the US itself. The whole world ignores it since everyone knows the USA is a great place and they don't do that kind of stuff there.

Well they do, and it's getting worse. Human Rights Watch has released an important and horrifying report on the wide and rampant amount of rape and other abuses in America's massive domestic prison complex. It's just unbelievable that the situation is so bad, and even more unbelievable that it's gone on for so long and no one even mentions it or does anything about it. People just don't realize how huge the US prison population is now, or what living hell the prisons are.

When I first came to prison, I had no idea what to expect. Certainly none of this. I'm a tall white male, who unfortunately has a small amount of feminine characteristics. And very shy. These characteristics have got me raped so many times I have no more feelings physically. I have been raped by up to 5 black men and two white men at a time. I've had knifes at my head and throat. I had fought and been beat so hard that I didn't ever think I'd see straight again. One time when I refused to enter a cell, I was brutally attacked by staff and taken to segragation though I had only wanted to prevent the same and worse by not locking up with my cell mate. There is no supervision after lockdown. I was given a conduct report. I explained to the hearing officer what the issue was. He told me that off the record, He suggests I find a man I would/could willingly have sex with to prevent these things from happening. I've requested protective custody only to be denied. It is not available here. He also said there was no where to run to, and it would be best for me to accept things . . . . I probably have AIDS now. I have great difficulty raising food to my mouth from shaking after nightmares or thinking to hard on all this . . . . I've laid down without physical fight to be sodomized. To prevent so much damage in struggles, ripping and tearing. Though in not fighting, it caused my heart and spirit to be raped as well. Something I don't know if I'll ever forgive myself for. ...

My name is Rodney Hulin and I work at a retirement home here in Beaumont, Texas. I am here today because of my son. He would be here himself if he could . . . . But he can't because he died in [an adult prison]. . . . [At age seventeen], my son was raped and sodomized by an inmate. The doctor found two tears in his rectum and ordered an HIV test, since up to a third of the 2,200 inmates there were HIV positive. Fearing for his safety, he requested to be placed in protective custody, but his request was denied because, as the warden put it, "Rodney's abuses didn't meet the 'emergency grievance criteria.'" For the next several months, my son was repeatedly beaten by the older inmates, forced to perform oral sex, robbed, and beaten again. Each time, his requests for protection were denied by the warden. The abuses, meanwhile, continued. On the night of January 26, 1996--seventy-five days after my son entered Clemens--Rodney attempted suicide by hanging himself in his cell. He could no longer stand to live in continual terror. It was too much for him to handle. He laid in a coma for the next four months until he died.

There are thousands, tens of thousands of accounts like this. It's not just a few people at a few prisons, but nearly everyone at nearly all prisons, in all 50 states. And the wardens, guards and other government officials are involved, and are makiing money off of it as well.

Another problem, nearly as heinous, is the growing extent of slave prison labor by American corporations, which has grown enormously under the Clinton and Bush administrations. Some say slave labor prisons may be one of the largest employers in the country now. That may be exaggerated, no one knows the real extent of it, just that it's incredibly profitable and a booming growth industry. But no one wants to talk about this, it's easier to spread this nonsense about how jobs have moved to Mexico and China and other places.

There are laws to prevent this of course, but the unspeakably vile lawyers who have taken over the government and the legal system (both liberals and conservatives, there's no difference) couldn't care less about the law or human rights. They're interested in making money off the cheap slave labor, and keeping people of color in line. The only organization really working to deal with this problem is Stop Prisoner Rape, which could use your help.

The horrific violence Americans are inflicting in Iraq and other places around the world, is just a reflection of and stems from the violence inside America itself. Until we deal with the core problems, there's no chance of dealing with the warmongering and other stuff, which are just symptoms. Our prison system is nothing more than an organization designed to breed vicious violent people. People, prisoners AND guards, come out there as less than human, and incapable of decency.

 permanent link image permalink, posted by mike on Thursday, February 15, 2007 at 11:49 AM



February 03, 2007


Hershey's and M&M/Mars continue to engage in child slavery.

This post in Undernews states that global corporations, in particular Hershey's and M&M/Mars are continuing to engage in extensive child slavery in Africa and other places where they get their chocolate. And they repeatedly refuse to abide by agreements they have made to terminate the practice. And of course, the federal government, controlled by the greedy and corrupt lawyers who have taken over the Democratic and Republican parties, is refusing to enforce its laws. This would implicate corporations such as Starbucks, which use extensive amounts of chocolate. Think about that the next time you get a mocha. If you still have any doubts that the American people are just as vile and evil as the Nazis or any other people who have ever lived, this should dispel those. But of course it won't, because evil people aren't capable of understanding the nature of evil. What kind of people would enslave children? Americans, that's who.

TEX DWORKIN, GLOBAL EXCHANGE FAIR TRADE ONLINE STORE, TREE HUGGER - This year marks the 100th anniversary of the Hershey's kiss, and yet a celebration is hardly in order. Why? Because with each bite, we are reminded that most chocolate sold in the U.S. comes from cocoa farms where farmers work in unsafe conditions, receive below poverty wages, many of them children under 14 years old who are forced to work and denied education. . . The Ivory Coast is the world's largest cocoa producer, providing 43% of the world's cocoa. And yet, in 2001 the U.S. State Department reported child slavery on many cocoa farms in the Ivory Coast. A 2002 report from the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture about cocoa farms in the Ivory Coast and other African countries estimated there were 284,000 children working on cocoa farms in hazardous conditions. U.S. chocolate manufacturers have claimed they are not responsible for the conditions on cocoa plantations since they don't own them. . .

Hershey's and M&M/Mars alone control two-thirds of the $13 billion U.S. chocolate candy market. The result? An industry marred with child slavery, unsafe working conditions and a cycle of poverty with no end in sight for cocoa farmers. Chocolate companies are not held accountable for sourcing practices, and despite their knowledge about the travesties that occur on cocoa farms, they lack the will to change.

The U.S. chocolate industry has faced multiple deadlines requiring new protocol, and yet little has changed. Under pressure from Congress, in the Harken-Engel Protocol, the U.S. chocolate industry agreed to voluntarily take steps to end child slavery on cocoa farms by July of 2005. This deadline has since passed, and the chocolate industry has failed to comply with the terms of this agreement. . .


 permanent link image permalink, posted by mike on Saturday, February 3, 2007 at 12:16 PM



January 31, 2007


The actions of the stock market really baffle me.

More and more I'm coming to the conclusion that the people in the stock markets must be living in an alternative universe from the rest of us. For instance, today there's a story in the NY times saying that Google has posted a "sharp rise" in profits. And yet the stock goes down. Last week, there was a report that Ford Motor Company lost more money than any time in its entire history, yet the stock went up. Very strange. I guess if I think about it there's some sense here. No matter how much money Google is making, if it's not as much as people expected, the stock will go down. And the fact that Ford is losing so much money must indicate that it's only a matter of time before it will be taken over by someone who's competent, which would make its stock a good bet in the long run. But it's still rather weird, and certainly indicates that stock prices are no longer at all directly related to how much money the companies are actually making or losing.

But investors were apparently hoping for even better results, and their initial reaction was negative. Google’s shares were off 2 to 3 percent in trading after regular hours.

Google said net income for the quarter nearly tripled to $1.03 billion, or $3.29 a share, up from $372.2 million, or $1.22 a share, in the fourth quarter of 2005. Excluding charges related to stock-based compensation and other adjustments, the company earned $997 million, or $3.18 a share, in the latest quarter.

Google’s quarterly revenue rose 67 percent. to $3.21 billion, from a year earlier. Google sells ads that are displayed on other sites and passes most of the revenue from those ads to the owners of those site. Excluding those payments, Google’s revenue totaled $2.23 billion in the fourth quarter.

As far as Ford and General Motors' problems go, I'm willing to bet that within ten years the Chinese, or at least a consortium of companies with major Chinese financing, will own one or the others' brands. Just a guess. :)

 permanent link image permalink, posted by mike on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 at 03:07 PM



January 30, 2007


Up in Alaska, the blog of an Alaskan cycler.

Stumbled onto the blog of a woman up in Alaska, Up in Alaska. Her obssession (her word) is cycling, generally long-distance cycling, generally alone, at all times of the year, even in the coldest and wettest conditions. In this recent post, Liquid gray infinity, she tries to explain why. I guess only people who are truly obsessed by something will ever understand. I can relate though. I don't think I'd ever be able to explain why being an artist is so important to me, although of course, at least with art there's a lot of money to be made. But I'd probably do it even without the money.

But the main reason I don’t talk about cycling obsession with anyone but the best of friends is my fear of the best question of all, the question I don’t know how to answer — “Why?”

“You spend all of your free time biking?” For the most part. “As a hobby?” Yes. “Do you get paid at all to ride your bike?” Of course not. “Do you ever plan to make any money riding a bike?” Well, no. “Are you trying to lose weight?” Not really.

“Then ... Why?”

Sometimes I feel like rebutting by asking them why they spend their free time playing World of Warcraft or TiVo-ing whatever reality train wrecks they’re showing on TV these days, but I know it’s not really a fair comparison. Their hobbies don’t send them out into the slush and biting cold, splattered in grit and varying shades of bruises. Their hobbies don’t require wearing soggy clothing made of unnatural fabrics and coping with equipment that seems to be in a constant state of disrepair. My hobby defines me as quirky and a little bit crazy, and I find it impossible to explain my way out of that.

There are times, though, that I ask myself the same question. It usually crosses my mind in the midst of a rough ride or the conditions I dislike the most - the watered-down slush, the wind. The rain.

Today I stopped at the North Douglas boat launch to pour the water out of my shoes and wipe my Camelbak nozzle free of a solid layer of grit. Nobody was out in the monotone drizzle of a Monday afternoon, and the calm water reflected the silence. Luxurious, billowing clouds draped over tree tops and tumbled down the mountainside like stain fabric.

I sat down for a moment on the beach, littered with broken mussel shells that sparkled in the dull light. I thought about my routine and its strange motions, and I thought a little about “Why.”

I live in a liquid world where everything is fleeting and nothing stays the same. The only thing I’m really certain of is the passing of time, the waves of good and bad that carry me forward. And the details - the possessions I acquire, the way that I look, the places I go, the people I meet, the people I love - are too often little more than glimmers of the present in a sea of memories. It's all too easy for me to drift away with the tide, become lost in that ocean, and forget that life is something that happens, not something I have.

What I really want is to live at the crest of every moment - every frightening, joyful, exhausting, brilliant, mundane moment - as they pass me by. And bicycling, in a way, is my means of staying afloat.


 permanent link image permalink, posted by mike on Tuesday, January 30, 2007 at 12:00 PM



January 27, 2007


Wolfgang's Vault, awesome new music site with vintage concerts.

Via Expecting Rain, the center for all things Bob Dylan related, I found this incredible new web site full of vintage concerts available for free listening. It turns out the great concert promoter Bill Graham made master soundboard recordings of just about all of the shows he ever produced. These tapes have been purchased by these folks who have been transferring them to digital form and making them available for listening off the web. They're all at Wolfgang's Vault (Wolfgang was Bill Graham's real name).

I can't believe the quality and variety of the music here, over 300 concerts so far and more coming on a regular basis. Graham made a point of showcasing and combining many different performers in his shows, so this isn't just rock music, but all different kinds of music, jazz, country, folk, rock, reggae, you name it. Miles, Emmylou Harris, great early Sly and the Family Stone, Pentangle, early Who, Asleep at the Wheel, Steve Earle, nearly every rock performer you've ever heard of extending well into the 80s, lots of singer songwriters of all types, it goes on and on and on. All in a very well designed web site which is easy to use, and quick to stream. Extremely impressive. I'm listening to this 1968 concert by Sly and the Family Stone as I write this, very early stuff just before they made it big, and my toes are tapping so hard I can barely write. Wow! In addition to the individual concerts, there's a radio stream where they play selected cuts, lots of assorted other goodies as well. No Dylan though, except this one show where he plays with Neil Young, Levon Helm, Rick Danko and other friends, but there's all the live Dylan you'll ever want over at Expecting Rain so that doesn't matter.

 permanent link image permalink, posted by mike on Saturday, January 27, 2007 at 04:14 PM



January 26, 2007


John Prine tells it like it is.

Found this great version of John Prine doing his song Flag Decal on YouTube. Although written in 1970 or so, it seems more relevant than ever. Especially note his pointed remarks about our "draft-dodging" so-called president at the end.



 permanent link image permalink, posted by mike on Friday, January 26, 2007 at 12:24 PM



December 07, 2006


Happy birthday to Tom Waits.

Via Wood s Lot is part of this poem about the American mess by Tom Waits and his wife Kathleen Brennan. What a great poet he is. Looking forward to Orphans, his new 3 disc extravaganza of assorted goodies.

In the Colosseum
(Tom Waits/K. Brennan)

This one's for the balcony
And this one's for the floor
As the senators decapitate
The presidential whore
The bald headed senators
Are splashing in the blood
The dogs are having someone
Who is screaming in the mud
In the colosseum tonight

Now it's raining and it's pouring
On the pillaging and goring
The constable is swinging
From the chains
For the dead there is no story
No memory no blame
Their families shout blue murder
But tomorrow it's the same
In the colosseum

(...)

No justice here, no liberty
No reason, no blame
There's no cause to taint the sweetest taste of blood
And greetings from the nation
As we shake the hands of time
They're taking their ovations
The vultures stay behind
In the colosseum, in the colosseum
In the colosseum tonight



 permanent link image permalink, posted by mike on Thursday, December 7, 2006 at 10:22 PM



November 30, 2006


Fighting the No Child Left Behind Act.

Via Undernews is this petition by teachers fighting the ridiculous No Child Left Behind Act. I like the list of things that are wrong with it, and the many links to other sources of info. Good job. It's a horrible piece of legislation that not only doesn't do what it's supposed to do, it actually is making things worse by taking valuable resouces and time from truly effective programs and teaching.

AN ONLINE PETITION FOR TEACHERS and others to sign against the atrocious No Child Left Behind Act has already received 9,000 signatures and it's just getting started. Writes activist Susan Ohanian, "Democrats as well as Republicans supported this law, which really is a continuation of a Business Roundtable proposal that was picked up by Arkansas Governor Bill Clinton and his business crony Lou Gerstner. They helped it become America 2000 under Bush the Elder and Goals 2000 under President Clinton. Now it's NCLB. And Hillary is pushing for a national test, something she and Bill failed to get during his tenure."

A FEW THINGS WRONG WITH NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND

1. Misdiagnoses the causes of poor educational development, blaming teachers and students for problems over which they have no control.

2. Assumes that competition is the primary motivator of human behavior and that market forces can cure all educational ills.

3. Mandates data driven instruction based on gamesmanship to undermine public confidence in our schools.

4. Uses pseudo science and media manipulation to justify pro-corporate policies and programs, including diverting taxes away from communities and into corporate coffers.

5. Ignores the proven inadequacies, inefficiencies, and problems associated with centralized, "top-down" control.

6. Places control of what is taught in corporate hands many times removed from students, teachers, parents, local school boards, and communities.

7. Requires the use of materials and procedures more likely to produce a passive, compliant workforce than creative, resilient, inquiring, critical, compassionate, engaged members of our democracy.

8. Reflects and perpetuates massive distrust of the skill and professionalism of educators.

9. Allows life-changing, institution-shaping decisions to hinge on single measures of performance.

10. Emphasizes minimum content standards rather than maximum development of human potential.

11. Neglects the teaching of higher order thinking skills which cannot be evaluated by machines.

12. Applies standards to discrete subjects rather than to larger goals such as insightful children, vibrant communities, and a healthy democracy.

13. Forces schools to adhere to a testing regime, with no provision for innovating, adapting to social change, encouraging creativity, or respecting student and community individuality, nuance, and difference.

14. Drives art, foreign language, career and technical education, physical education, geography, history, civics and other non-tested subjects, such as music, out of the curriculum, especially in low-income neighborhoods.

15. Produces multiple, unintended consequences for students, teachers, and communities, including undermining neighborhood schools and blurring the line between church and state.

16. Rates and ranks public schools using procedures that will gradually label them all "failures," so when they fail to make Adequate Yearly Progress, as all schools eventually will, they can be "saved" by vouchers, charters, or privatization.

COMMENTS BY PETITION SIGNERS


 permanent link image permalink, posted by mike on Thursday, November 30, 2006 at 11:15 PM



November 15, 2006


Civility in a Democracy: A conversation with Miss Manners.

Came across this interview with the fascinating Judith Martin, better known as Miss Manners. She's quite a gal, sharp as a tack and quite outspoken. She's been writing on the history of etiquette in the world, especially in the US, and has come up with some interesting facts.

NEH Chairman Bruce Cole talks with Judith Martin about how standards of behavior were adapted for an American democracy. Known to readers of her syndicated column as Miss Manners, Judith Martin is the author of twelve books, among them Star-Spangled Manners.

[...]

Martin: There has been etiquette throughout history. It melds with other things. It melds with religion. The Bible is full of things which are really etiquette rules, and so are other religious tracts. Every society has to have an etiquette.

Cole: You draw a distinction between etiquette and manners and morals, right?

Martin: Yes. I also draw a distinction between manners and etiquette, manners being the principles which are eternal, and etiquette being the surface behavior, which varies and changes.

Manners have a moral basis. Manners are to etiquette as morality is to the law. Matters of serious morality have to be handled by the law because etiquette depends on the consent of the people practicing it. It has no punishment other than social disapproval--on up to shunning--which can be powerful, but it's not as powerful as throwing someone in jail.

[...]

Cole: How the Founding Fathers dealt with the new democracy is of particular interest to me. ... The Founders had to set the course. Jefferson wrote on etiquette. And so did Washington, right?

Martin: Washington copied out the Jesuits' rules, but, yes, he was also always making etiquette pronouncements and even etiquette decisions. I always quote him when people ask, "Well, if your guest is late for dinner, should you wait?" Washington never waited. He said his cook would kill him. He made the original rules of presidential protocol. The president doesn't have to return calls. He would have his levees and receive people, but he did not return calls. Still, there were people traipsing through Mount Vernon all the time to his great annoyance.

[...]

Cole: One of the things you write about is the evolution of Southern hospitality, which I found fascinating.

Martin: The plantation owners thought they were being English country gentlemen, but who was teaching etiquette to their children? The house slaves. The house slaves often came from a more elevated background than the masters. They were chosen among the slaves as the people who were more refined. They had been captured and brought over from Africa, whereas, of course, voluntary immigrants came because things weren't so great at home. The house slave, usually the mammy, taught manners to the children. So she taught them the manners she knew. The "y'all come see me" kind of hospitality is an African tradition that they brought over. Using honorary family titles, aunt so-and-so and uncle so-and-so, where there's no relationship, but to convey something between strict formality and informality--these kinds of things crept in to become what are now known as Southern manners.

Cole: The frontier and issues of space, that's uniquely American, right?

Martin: Very much so. Other countries didn't tend to have that kind of space. And they didn't tend to have that kind of mix. From this has evolved what we think of as American manners. I always get annoyed when people think, oh, they're just watered-down English manners. Well, no, they are not.

It's ok not to wait for guests for dinner. I didn't know that. But if it's ok with George Washington and Miss Manners I guess that's good enouigh for me. The entire interview is well worth reading, she's got a lot to say.

 permanent link image permalink, posted by mike on Wednesday, November 15, 2006 at 10:59 PM



October 25, 2006


Massive war profiteering by Bush family members.

Via Common Dreams is this excellent round-up by Heather Wokusch of the various ways the Bush family is profiteering from their wars, How the Bush Family Makes a Killing from George's Presidency. I can't believe that people are just turning their eyes from this level of corruption and perfidy, not when it's so widespread and so very, very well documented. And it's everyone in the family, not just a few of them. That's what's so disgusting. It's worth reading the whole thing, about Neil and Marvin and Uncle Bucky, but I guess the most interesting is on what the senior George Bush has been up to.

Bush's dad has strong connections to the Carlyle Group, a massive private equity investment firm whose Chairman Emeritus is Frank Carlucci, a former college roommate of Donald Rumsfeld's and former Defense Secretary under Ronald Reagan. Imagine the pull Carlucci has with today's White House.

But Carlucci has another secret weapon - Bush Sr. Amid conflict-of-interest allegations, the elder Bush resigned from the Carlyle Group in 2003, but reportedly remains on retainer, opening doors to lucrative profits in the Middle East and elsewhere. Bush Sr.'s specialty is Saudi Arabia; in fact, he was at a Carlyle investment conference with Osama bin Laden's estranged brother, Shafiq bin Laden, when the 9/11 attacks took place.

Carlyle specializes in military and security investments, and with Bush Jr. in office, the company's profits have soared; it received $677 million in contracts in 2002, then a whopping $2.1 billion in 2003. Carlyle's investors currently enjoy an equity capital pool of over 44 billion dollars.

In January 2006, Bush Sr. wrote China's Foreign Affairs Ministry that it would be "beneficial to the comprehensive development of Sino-US relations" if Beijing approved the sale of a Chinese bank to a consortium which included Carlyle. Bluntly put, Bush Sr. asked China to grant Carlyle a lucrative business deal or risk his son's wrath. Foreign policy at its finest.

I did not realize that at the moment of the 9/11 attacks, while George Jr. was reading 'My Pet Goat' to the kids, Bush Sr. was actually in a meeting with a bin Laden. Unbelievable.

I also think that people should know that Vice President Cheney continues to hold over 400,000 options on shares in Haliburton, while openly steering them all the business they can handle. It's beyond scandalous that a sitting vice president should be openly making so much money war profiteering at such a critical time.

But what she's talking about is just the tip of the iceberg. She's just discussing current profit making activities, not those from the larger investments that the Bush family and their many relatives and retainers have in the larger military-industrial-financial-legal-media complex. It's spread out and shielded and well hidden, but they own staggering chunks of the world. They are making tens of billiions out of this war, if not more. This is the most massive war profteering in world history. By far.

 permanent link image permalink, posted by mike on Wednesday, October 25, 2006 at 02:29 PM



August 06, 2006


Horrific BBC report on torture in America's prisons.

The BBC has produced a graphic news program on torture in America's prisons, Torture Inc: America's Brutal Prisons. This is not the torture in Iraq, Guantanamo and other places outside the US, but in domestic prisons. It's very widespread, and extremely brutal. But no one talks about it, or about the way the culture of brutality has become normalized in the US. It's a very graphic program, a must see really. Includes videos of people being literally beaten to death. The brutality of the guards is just unbelievable.

 permanent link image permalink, posted by mike on Sunday, August 6, 2006 at 11:16 PM



April 01, 2006


Good overview of America's huge domestic gulag.

Steve Lendman has a good lengthy overview of the abysmal state of the US's domestic prison gulag. With over 2 million incarcerated it is probably the largest in world history, almost certainly larger than any Hitler or Stalin or any other "evil" dictators ever had at one time. It's so scandalous that people talk about torture and American prisoners outside of the US and just ignore the abominable conditions inside the US. It's a very long article with some much needed information about the so-called War on Drugs, the growing use of prisoners as free corporate slave labor (which is costing Americans a hell of a lot more jobs than low wages overseas), extensive torture and much else.

Prisons, with few exceptions, are not intended for rehabilitation. They are institutions societies use for vengeance and punishment. There are the most gruesome hellholes around the world the US takes full advantage of just in the prisoners it "renditions" for attempted information extraction by some of the worst physical and psychological tortures the human mind can conceive. But this essay is about what goes on in US prisons within our borders, and what you'll read below will sound like reports about Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib. Get ready to feel your skin crawl.

Everything we saw on TV months ago about prisoner torture at Abu Ghraib (and heard goes on at Guantanamo) happens in our state and federal prison system right here at home and lots more we didn't see or hear about. These are the lessons and techniques first devised and used in US based torture-prisons and then exported for use in our comparable torture-prisons around the world. That's the way things are in all our prisons, and in the language of author Gertrude Stein when she referred to roses: a prison is a prison is a prison. The main difference between San Quentin and Abu Ghraib is their location. What goes on at both and all others includes savage beatings by prison guards; attacks by fierce dogs that inflict real bites; severe shocking with cattle prods and 50,000 volt emitting Taser electro-shock guns often used multiple times that make the victim shake for hours after being struck and can also kill and often do; assaults by toxic chemicals like pepper spray strong enough to inflict severe pain, second degree burns, temporary blindness, and even death in a vulnerable victim; and all this happening at times with prisoners stripped naked including brutal rapes by guards, other prisoners and much more.

A courageous woman activist imprisoned for several months for her actions told me the case of a woman she saw stripped naked in her cell and then bound suspended in spread-eagle form on her prison bars and left there for hours to suffer. The experience devastated her and nearly killed her. And she was another activist being punished for her courageous acts. Hard to believe? You'd better believe it because it goes on every day in all prisons routinely throughout the country - acts of deliberate barbarity and sadism, so severe they can and do kill and often leave their victims an emotional shell when they don't. Whenever you hear reports about prisoners committing suicide, you'd better think hard about it. It's most likely they were murdered by prison guards and reported as suicide. It may be from repeated Taser shocks, from being beaten to death so savagely every rib in their body was broken or just from a body giving out from repeated and brutal maltreatment over a long period with nothing more to look forward to but more of the same. How many can endure the worst of that? No one in a civilized country should ever have to. And no civilized person should believe they had it coming. [...]

The for-profit side of running a gulag began to explode during the Reagan years when incarceration rates began increasing dramatically. Along with a growing private prisons industry (a small slice of the prison pie still largely a public enterprise), a vast array of private businesses wanted a piece of the action and got it. These include architectural and construction companies; food service contractors; all sorts of equipment, hardware and other suppliers of steel doors, razor wire, communications systems, and health care and medical supplies. There's also a big need for uniforms and assorted weapons including dangerous products to restrain like clemical sprays that can injure, cause severe pain, second degree burns, temporary blindness or worse and taser electro-shock guns that emit 50,000 volts of electricity (enough to flatten an all-pro NFL lineman in peak form) that can and have killed as many as 167 victims from it's use through January, 2006. And there's loads more. The (mal) care and feeding of a couple of million humans takes a lot of supplying to keep the system going. Add it all up and it's big business, and it gets bigger with every new prison and the inmates to fill them. Not to worry. Unlike oil, there's no chance of running out bodies.

The big players in this growing industry are the private companies that run the hellholes. And the ones they run are even more hellish than the public ones. Private, publicly owned corporations with shareholders and Wall Street to please always need a growing revenue and profit stream and strict cost control to maximize the bottom line part of it. That means understaffing, low pay for poorly trained staff, poor and unsafe conditions, little or no life-enhancing or self-help programs like educational opportunities or counseling services to rehabilitate those in need like ilicit drug users, and even worse medical care than the third world kind in the publicly run system. Why bother, they all cost money, reduce profits and constrain shareholder equity. Private contractors can also exploit prisoners as de facto chattel. They're not obliged to pay wages or benefits and can take full advantage of all those bodies free of charge. Why would they ever pass that up. It's one more revenue and profit stream.

The private side of running prisons is still a small part of the total. But it's growing, and as it does, it's darker side may just get darker. Unlike most businesses, quality control is not one of their concerns. If humans suffer to enhance the bottom line, who will care. In running a gulag, you just gotta keep 'em under control locked in cages, and if you use, abuse and lose some along the way, there's plenty more supply to fill the available beds. That's how it works in a nation that commodifies its masses and exploits them. [...]

Our prison system alone is a stark symbol and reminder of a society based on militarism and imperial conquest abroad, the shredding of our civil liberties at home, and the dismantling of our social contract obligation along with the transfer of wealth to the privileged and powerful. It reflects a nation descending into the hell of tyranny and despotism that threatens to become worse and affect us all except those at the top. We've created the monster of a national security police state (run by the new Department of Homeland Security and Office of the Director of National Intelligence) to control a growing restive population that will likely grow larger. It will include many more of us as those in need grow in numbers and new demons are easily found, targeted and moved to prison cells to maintain absolute control. That's how it works in all tyrannical states, even ones claiming to be democracies like ours but which, in fact, are not.

All the problems with torture and abuse by Americans overseas have their core in the problems here. Until they are dealt with here, they will just continue to spread, both here and abroad. Haliburton was just given a contract worth several hundred million dollars to begin preparations for building large complexes of "detention centers" to supposedly hold "illegal immigrants", but they could be for anyone. They are clearly prepared to incarcerate millions more, and are capable of doing it too. The big difference between these people and the likes of the Nazis and the Soviets is that the Americans have a lot more money, a lot better technology and infinitely many more resources to carry out their plans. They may or may not be as "evil", but they certainly are capable of causing untold amounts of suffering.

It's hard for most Americans to acknowledge that "dissenters" and political prisoners are regularly tortured in the US, but they are. Very brutally assaulted and tortured on a regular and systematic basis. People wonder why more Americans don't speak out and fight what's going on. It's because they're afraid.

 permanent link image permalink, posted by mike on Saturday, April 1, 2006 at 12:36 PM



February 21, 2005


Brooklyn's Abu Ghraib.

A lot of Americans are trying to deny the realities of the extensive torture and abuse happening in American prisons worldwide by telling themselves that this is just a few bad apples, and, most importantly, that this doesn't happen inside the US. But it does, and has been been going on for a long time now.

Larry Cohler-Esses reports in the New York Daily News that both Jews and Muslims suspected of so-called "terrorism" were held in inhumane conditions, and subjected to repeated beatings, and other abuse. The details in fact are remarkably similar to those reported to have happened in Cuba, Iraq and Afghanistan.

Defense attorneys call it Brooklyn's Abu Ghraib. On the ninth floor of the federal Metropolitan Detention Center in Sunset Park, terrorism suspects swept off the streets after the Sept. 11 attacks were repeatedly stripped naked and frequently were physically abused, the Justice Department's inspector general has found.

The detainees - none of whom were ultimately charged with anything related to terrorism - alleged in sworn affidavits and in interviews with Justice Department officials that correction officers:

* Humiliated them by making fun of - and sometimes painfully squeezing - their genitals.

* Deprived them of regular sleep for weeks or months.

* Shackled their hands and feet before smashing them repeatedly face-first into concrete walls - within sight of the Statue of Liberty.

* Forced them in winter to stand outdoors at dawn while dressed in light cotton prison garb and no shoes, sometimes for hours.

"In December, they left me outside for more than four hours [wearing] only a jumpsuit and a light prison coat," Ahmed Khalifa, an Egyptian, told the Daily News. "I asked them to let me inside. They were laughing and pointing to me. When I finally got back inside, I felt like I had frostbite."

There's a lot more in the article, pretty horrific in places. Strip searches 6 times a day, even though they were shacked in chains and held in solitary!!! Especially hard to realize this is New York we're tallking about. Note that these were not just Muslims.

Oded Ellner - one of five Israeli Jewish terrorist suspects - said he sought medical help after MDC's allegedly meager, often spoiled meals left him with severe dysentery symptoms. The doctor came with five guards and a camera, he said. She then ordered him to strip and shift his backside into a small space in the cell door so she could conduct a rectal exam from outside the cell.

"I'm a human being, not an animal!" Ellner said he shouted. "I have a right to an exam." The guards, he said, "just laughed," and all walked away.

These practices are now standard in American prisons, both here and abroad. Prisoners, especially those not American citizens, are simply not considered to possess any rights at all. They're not even considered human. Consider the cruelty in deliberately giving prisoners spoiled food in order to make them sick. They wouldn't even do that to an animal.

And there is a deliberate policy of hiring sadistic and violent people as prison guards and officers, not to mention doctors and lawyers. It just keeps getting worse. I know that's hard to believe, but that's the way it is. Note that none of these people were ever charged with anything (except visa violations.) They suffered permanent injuries.

And people wonder why the folks in NY were attacked.

 permanent link image permalink, posted by mike on Monday, February 21, 2005 at 12:45 PM



February 18, 2005


Demands to stop illegal child labor at Wal-Mart.

Via Truthout is this demand by child labor and union activists that Wal-Mart stop engaging in illegal child labor. It's already been fined repeatedly for it, but with the connivance of the Labor Department itself is still getting away with it.

The Food and Commercial Workers Union and Child Labor Coalition present a proposal to immediately stop the use of children in hazardous jobs at the nation's largest employer.

Wal-Mart could stop illegal child labor in its stores through distinctive employee badges for underage workers that could readily identify them as being prohibited from hazardous assignments, according to the United Food and Commercial Workers Union and the Child Labor Coalition. Combined with unannounced Labor Department inspections, the use of children for hazardous jobs would come to a rapid halt.

The two organizations are sponsoring, at http://www.ufcw.org/, an e-mail campaign directed at Wal-Mart CEO Lee Scott and U.S. Labor Secretary Elaine Chao asking them to abandon a sweetheart deal on child labor announced earlier this week, and to take meaningful action to end the abuse of young workers.

Key to the union/coalition proposal is the re-badging of underage workers. Both managers and young workers would always be aware that certain assignments are illegal. Compliance would require unannounced inspections to make sure that badges are properly issued, and that no manager is pressuring minors into illegal assignments.

Scott and Chao are being presented with a demand to amend a settlement agreement that required the Labor Department to give Wal-Mart an unprecedented 15 days notice before any inspection. Advanced notice clearly undermines compliance, and allows managers simply to re-assign underage workers before an inspection.

... Hundreds of children are maimed and crippled in accidents, some losing arms and legs, every year involving balers and compactors commonly used in Wal-Mart and other retail stores to handle the disposal of boxes and similar materials. The law has long prohibited minors from operating this kind of machinery. A Labor Department investigation brought allegations that Wal-Mart was using illegal child labor to operate the hazardous equipment in several states. To settle the case, Wal-Mart paid $135,000 and the Labor Department agreed to advance notice of inspections.

The sweetheart arrangement between the Labor Department and Wal-Mart is one of the sleaziest and most illegal deals allowed by the Bush administration, and that's saying something. It violates so many laws and principles they can't even be counted.

 permanent link image permalink, posted by mike on Friday, February 18, 2005 at 03:48 PM



February 11, 2005


Extraordinary rendition.

In a NY Times column, Torture, American Style, Bob Herbert discusses the American people's practice of "outsourcing torture" or "extraordinary rendition", the process of flying people to other countries to torture them.

He's commenting on a recent article in the New Yorker, Outsourcing Torture by Jane Mayer, that gives a "secret history" of America's extraordinary rendition program, and describes how it has now become standard policy.

This is one of the great euphemisms of our time. Extraordinary rendition is the name that's been given to the policy of seizing individuals without even the semblance of due process and sending them off to be interrogated by regimes known to practice torture. In terms of bad behavior, it stands side by side with contract killings.

Our henchmen in places like Syria, Egypt, Morocco, Uzbekistan and Jordan are torturing terror suspects at the behest of a nation - the United States - that just went through a national election in which the issue of moral values was supposed to have been decisive. How in the world did we become a country in which gays' getting married is considered an abomination, but torture is O.K.?

The Americans are now taking anyone they want, American citizen or not, and imprisoning and torturing them as they will without any attempt at due process. And we're talking serious torture here; by organized professionals in well equipped torture centers. Torture that may not last forever, but which is deliberately designed so that the memory of its effects will never go away. And in which doctors participate, advising on how to create the most pain with the least permanent marks or damage.

Mr. Arar was seized because his name had turned up on a watch list of terror suspects. He was reported to have been a co-worker of a man in Canada whose brother was a suspected terrorist.

"Although he initially tried to assert his innocence, he eventually confessed to anything his tormentors wanted him to say," Ms. Mayer wrote.

The confession under torture was worthless. Syrian officials reported back to the United States that they could find no links between Mr. Arar and terrorism. He was released in October 2003 without ever being charged and is now back in Canada.

Barbara Olshansky is the assistant legal director of the Center for Constitutional Rights, which is representing Mr. Arar in a lawsuit against the U.S. I asked her to describe Mr. Arar's physical and emotional state following his release from custody.

She sounded shaken by the memory. "He's not a big guy," she said. "He had lost more than 40 pounds. His pallor was terrible, and his eyes were sunken. He looked like someone who was kind of dead inside."

Because he was a "co-worker of a man in Canada whose brother was a suspected terrorist." Jesus. That could be ANYONE. Anyone at all. That could be ME. Or YOU. What do YOU really know about the relatives of YOUR co-workers? :) Come on. They could haul you away just because someone you WORK with knows someone who MAY be involved in something, even though they haven't been convicted of anything. Talk about your vague and arbitrary standards.

(Everyone's acting as if this (torture, that is) is some new development of the Bush administration. But it's been going on, if not on the same scale, for some decades. The US set up the School of the Americas to train torturers back in the 1960s, if I'm not mistaken. It has continued to operate since then, with only a brief break during the Carter administration. No one really knows what they've been doing all this time. But disturbing reports have been heard for a long, long time now, regularly reported in the alternative press. From Vietnam, central America and other places. It's nothing new.)

 permanent link image permalink, posted by mike on Friday, February 11, 2005 at 11:22 AM



February 10, 2005


Bush wants to cut funds for Amtrak.

Via Common Dreams is Derailing Amtrak, an article by Derrick Z. Jackson which discusses Bush's proposed elimination of operating subsidies for Amtrak. And compares it unfavorably to the increased support for rail travel in the rest of the world.

That is on top of the already excellent and heavily subsidized rail in Western Europe and Japan. They see the future, and it is not an SUV. Besides the environmental perils of automobiles, the Stockholm Environmental Institute, an international research group, reported last summer that the explosion of air travel is one of the most serious future threats to local quality of life (noise) and a disproportionate contributor to global warming.

Even with its highly developed rail system, Europe is still a continent where 45 percent of flights are of distances less than 300 miles. The report recommended that governments develop strategies to shift short trips from air to rail and to develop enough commuter access to airports so that no more than 50 percent of air travelers arrive by automobile.

That study puts an interesting twist on news here at home. Bush's budget proposal includes $35 billion for highways, $14 billion for airports, and no operating subsidies for Amtrak. All Amtrak would get is $360 million to keep up some commuter services. This is despite the amazing fact that no matter how much Bush wants to kill Amtrak on the false premise that it must be self-sufficient (when airlines and automobile gasoline of course are not), people vote with their feet that they want rail. A record 25 million passengers took Amtrak trains last year. This was not just an East Coast commuter phenomenon. Ridership was up 14 percent in Iowa last year. Amtrak ridership is up 13 percent in car-crazy California.

At the same time Bush announced his budget, Delta Air Lines announced that it was ending the promise of rolling out a second plane on its shuttles between Boston, New York, and Washington when the first plane became full. For people who fly during rush hour, it means that people who fail to make a flight might as well have taken the train.

Delta's announcement, plus $2-a-gallon gasoline, ought to be the beginning of a better day. Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta trashed Amtrak this week, saying the president will not fund a company that has "lost" $29 billion in subsidies over 34 years. That is not even $2 billion a year. Other nations do not see rail subsidies as a loss. They see them as an investment in civilized living.

Even if Congress untangles Bush's proposed derailment of Amtrak, which it usually does, it will be for a bare-bones rescue, with no funds for the long term. The United States will fall further and further behind in passenger rail. Other countries long ago boarded the express. Even Bush's fellow Republicans can see that. In 2002 John Robert Smith said, "We literally spend more collecting road kill off the nation's highways than we spend on the entire passenger rail system."

This is incredibly short-sighted. A viable rail network is important for security, economic, environmental and other reasons. What would happen to the US if it's airspace was closed down again, as it was on 9/11. The amount of money being saved here is miniscule compared to what it would buy, and would more than pay for itself in savings of time, money and energy. And the American people have repeatedly said that they want more railways. Ridership is up, not down. So why are they cutting funding?

 permanent link image permalink, posted by mike on Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 11:48 AM



December 22, 2004


ACLU releases document proving Bush ordered torture.

The ACLU has released a report proving that immediately after the 9/11 attacks, Bush issued an Executive Order authorizing, and it would seem, ordering, the use of torture by American forces and agents.

They also released memos indicating that the FBI was aware of, and concerned with, acts of torture in both Iraq and Guantanamo Bay, back in 2003.

The two-page e-mail that references an Executive Order states that the President directly authorized interrogation techniques including sleep deprivation, stress positions, the use of military dogs, and "sensory deprivation through the use of hoods, etc." The ACLU is urging the White House to confirm or deny the existence of such an order and immediately to release the order if it exists. The FBI e-mail, which was sent in May 2004 from "On Scene Commander--Baghdad" to a handful of senior FBI officials, notes that the FBI has prohibited its agents from employing the techniques that the President is said to have authorized.

Another e-mail, dated December 2003, describes an incident in which Defense Department interrogators at Guantnamo Bay impersonated FBI agents while using "torture techniques" against a detainee. The e-mail concludes "If this detainee is ever released or his story made public in any way, DOD interrogators will not be held accountable because these torture techniques were done [sic] the ‘FBI’ interrogators. The FBI will [sic] left holding the bag before the public."

The document also says that no "intelligence of a threat neutralization nature" was garnered by the "FBI" interrogation, and that the FBI’s Criminal Investigation Task Force (CITF) believes that the Defense Department’s actions have destroyed any chance of prosecuting the detainee. The e-mail’s author writes that he or she is documenting the incident "in order to protect the FBI."

This is what they call a "smoking gun": indisputable proof that far from being a case of a "few bad apples", American torture and terrorism are standard techniques, not only tolerated by the very highest levels of government, including the President, but actually ordered by them.

It should also be pointed out though that the use of torture by Americans has been going on for decades, throughout both Democratic and Republican adminstrations. There are countless reports of this from Vietnam and Central America, among other places, during the 60s, 70s and 80s. Virtually none of which were ever investigated, much less prosecuted, by officials of either party.

And the so-called School of the Americas, the torture training academy run by the US, was allowed to operate throughout Clinton's administrations. Torture, in fact, was a standard part of the War of Drugs long before it became part of the War on Terror.

But no other US president has actually and specifically order torture to be used the way Bush apparently did. It seems in fact, that he did so mostly just out of a sadistic desire to see other people suffer, and not because of any belief that it was necessary to pursue his so-called war on "terror."

 permanent link image permalink, posted by mike on Wednesday, December 22, 2004 at 02:05 PM



August 06, 2004


From Abu Ghraib to American prisons.

Via AlterNet, Normon Solomon writes on the racial and class divisions that underlie American's prison abuses, From Attica to Abu Ghraib – and a Prison Near You. A short history of the abuses in America's prisons, going back to the horrors of Attica in 1971, and an overview of the racism and contempt for the poor that underlies the climate of cruelty and inhumanity to others that is becoming (or rather, has become) the trademark of 21st century America.

The part about Attica is especially important. Well suppressed by American media is the fact that torture and abuse were prevalent in American prisons decades ago, is nothing new, and has continued to get much worse. Attica exploded in 1971 because conditions there had gotten so bad, and it is only a matter of time before the even worse conditions of today result in even worse outbreaks.

Every day, brutality is a common reality for prisoners in every region of this country. But what goes on behind closed cell doors and thick walls rarely gets exposed to media sunlight.

"I do not view the sexual abuse, torture and humiliation of Iraqi prisoners by American soldiers as an isolated event," says Terry Kupers, a psychiatrist who has often testified about human rights abuses in U.S. prisons. "The plight of prisoners in the USA is strikingly similar to the plight of the Iraqis who were abused by American GIs. Prisoners are maced, raped, beaten, starved, left naked in freezing cold cells and otherwise abused in too many American prisons, as substantiated by findings in many courts that prisoners' constitutional rights to remain free of cruel and unusual punishment are being violated."

Kupers adds: "In order for the abuses to continue, one group has total control over another; the victims feel they have no recourse and the perpetrators are confident they can get away with it; and the entire ordeal has to remain secret."

That's where the news media should come in – preventing such secrecy.

When the public learned about abuses at Abu Ghraib, there was outrage. But what's going on behind bars in America today still cannot stand the light of media day.

Actually, there hasn't been much "outrage" about Abu Ghraib, at least not from Americans. (There certainly has been outside the US, though, where it has become a watershed event.) It's pretty much dropped off the news. Google, among other media outlets, is censoring the images and news reports, which hasn't been reported at all, and the various investigations and trials are clearly shaping up as something that can best be described as a travesty. No Democrat at their convention even mentioned it. And virtually all of the people responsible are still in charge, and essentially continuing on as before. To me this is the real scandal. Things like that do happen, especially in war. But to cover up and ignore crimes this horrendous is itself a crime of absolutely enormous proportions, and clearly indicates that much worse is yet to come.

I still can't believe that the government has been successful in preventing the release of the remainder of the photos and videos that were taken in Iraq. The ones Rumsfeld himself referred to as "much worse." And that no one seems to care. Why haven't Kerry or Edwards at least once demanded that they be released?

 permanent link image permalink, posted by mike on Friday, August 6, 2004 at 01:06 PM



July 30, 2004


9/11 report a bestseller, despite being available for free.

The major argument made against people being able to download stuff off the internet for free is that it will cut into sales. You hear this over and over and over again: if it's free then people won't pay for it. Despite overwhelming evidence through the years that this just isn't so, and that, in fact, making something available for free in one format generally improves its sales in other formats.

So the 9/11 Commission's report is an excellent example. Here's something that is easily available over the web, and in multiple formats (HTML, PDF, probably more). And its availability has been widely publicized. And yet the printed, for sale version, has become an instant best-seller, and looks like it will sell millions. Curious. People could simply print it out off the web if they had objections to reading it on the screen and really wanted a hard copy, but they prefer to buy it.

This should clearly debunk the myth that people won't buy something if it's also available for free, but I guess people will believe what they want to believe, regardless of the facts. Nothing new really. For years free radio play has helped promote record sales, and yet the record companies continue to argue that it hasn't.

There's a NY Times article about the publishing of the book. Apparently with no royalties to pay (the federal government doesn't copyright it's own stuff?) and endless free publicity it's turned into a publisher's dream.

 permanent link image permalink, posted by mike on Friday, July 30, 2004 at 02:12 PM



May 26, 2004


Susan Sontag on American torture.

Noted writer Susan Sontag has written a long piece, Regarding the Torture on Others for the NY Times Magazine. She discusses a number of subjects, most especially the inability of Americans to acknowledge that the word "torture" is applicable here.

The Bush administration and its defenders have chiefly sought to limit a public-relations disaster -- the dissemination of the photographs -- rather than deal with the complex crimes of leadership and of policy revealed by the pictures. There was, first of all, the displacement of the reality onto the photographs themselves. The administration's initial response was to say that the president was shocked and disgusted by the photographs -- as if the fault or horror lay in the images, not in what they depict. There was also the avoidance of the word ''torture.'' The prisoners had possibly been the objects of ''abuse,'' eventually of ''humiliation'' -- that was the most to be admitted. ''My impression is that what has been charged thus far is abuse, which I believe technically is different from torture,'' Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld said at a press conference. ''And therefore I'm not going to address the 'torture' word.''

Words alter, words add, words subtract. It was the strenuous avoidance of the word ''genocide'' while some 800,000 Tutsis in Rwanda were being slaughtered, over a few weeks' time, by their Hutu neighbors 10 years ago that indicated the American government had no intention of doing anything. To refuse to call what took place in Abu Ghraib -- and what has taken place elsewhere in Iraq and in Afghanistan and at Guantanamo Bay -- by its true name, torture, is as outrageous as the refusal to call the Rwandan genocide a genocide. Here is one of the definitions of torture contained in a convention to which the United States is a signatory: ''any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person information or a confession.'' (The definition comes from the 1984 Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. Similar definitions have existed for some time in customary law and in treaties, starting with Article 3 -- common to the four Geneva conventions of 1949 -- and many recent human rights conventions.) The 1984 convention declares, ''No exceptional circumstances whatsoever, whether a state of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or any other public emergency, may be invoked as a justification of torture.'' And all covenants on torture specify that it includes treatment intended to humiliate the victim, like leaving prisoners naked in cells and corridors.

Well worth reading. She does an excellent job of placing not only the abuse but the photographing of that abuse in the context of American culture and (so-called) values. For instance, comparing them to older photographs taken of grinning whites standing underneath the lynched bodies of African-Americans. And on and on.

Even more appalling, since the pictures were meant to be circulated and seen by many people: it was all fun. And this idea of fun is, alas, more and more -- contrary to what President Bush is telling the world -- part of ''the true nature and heart of America.'' It is hard to measure the increasing acceptance of brutality in American life, but its evidence is everywhere, starting with the video games of killing that are a principal entertainment of boys -- can the video game ''Interrogating the Terrorists'' really be far behind? -- and on to the violence that has become endemic in the group rites of youth on an exuberant kick. Violent crime is down, yet the easy delight taken in violence seems to have grown. From the harsh torments inflicted on incoming students in many American suburban high schools -- depicted in Richard Linklater's 1993 film, ''Dazed and Confused'' -- to the hazing rituals of physical brutality and sexual humiliation in college fraternities and on sports teams, America has become a country in which the fantasies and the practice of violence are seen as good entertainment, fun.


 permanent link image permalink, posted by mike on Wednesday, May 26, 2004 at 11:04 AM


Google definitely censoring news images.

Google advertises its image search page as "The most comprehensive image search on the web." Yet a Google search for images from Abu Ghraib turns up none of the many widely publicized photos of abuse at the Iraqi prison. Yes, that's right. NONE. Not even the one of the hooded figure standing on the box with the wires attached that has been very well publicized.

This is very disturbing. They have long refused to disclose any information about the extent of the searching and information-compiling that they are doing for government agencies, as has Microsoft. But this takes that a step further to suggest that they are actively working with the government to suppress information. Could it be related to the fact that among the companies that they have chosen to back their upcoming IPO are Morgan-Stanley and Credit-Suisse, both of which are at the very heart of the American financial-legal-industrial-military complex? Both these companies themselves and their many clients have extensive investments in America's defense industries, and very close personal relationships with the politicians who finance them. Is there a quid pro quid going on here, where they refuse to publish information critical of those companies in return for favorable analysis of their stock plans?

And one can only wonder exactly what else are they censoring? News? Web sites critical of American actions? And, especially, stories that may perhaps raise doubts about their upcoming IPO and/or about the companies that are behind it? What are their policies on censorship?

The argument that these photos are too disturbing, pornographic or obscene to reproduce doesn't hold much water given that they continue to allow you to search for nude photos, pornography and other adult materials. They have filtering on their image search that normally hides adult photos from those who don't want to see them, but the prison photos don't show up even with that disabled.

At the very least they need to rewrite their slogan: "The most comprehensive image search on the web." At the minimum, take out the "comprehensive" since that clearly isn't true. Perhaps it should be: "The most heavily censored image search on the web."

 permanent link image permalink, posted by mike on Wednesday, May 26, 2004 at 10:52 AM



May 24, 2004


America's mercenary corporations.

In two different articles, The Other U.S. Military and The Outsourced War "Is Here to Stay", Business Week reviews the growing role (and profits) of private American military contractors.

You can take these two different ways. If you're a decent human being you will almost certainly be appalled that American corporations are so gleefully making billions of dollars profiting from what is in effect cold-blooded murder. (Basically they are what the Mafia used to call "hit men.") Or if you're a corporate money junkie you will be delighted to know how much money you can make in investing in companies that manufacture weapons of mass destruction, that provide torturers and other thugs to anyone who has the money to pay for them, and which engage in a wide range of activities that the rest of the world considers "war crimes", most of which are very specifically prohibited by both American and international law.

(This is a great investment actually if you're into that sort of thing. Perennial government contracts are being given to companies that are allowed to operate completely outside of the law, even in direct defiance of it, and without any sort of regulation or legal restraint, and which are allowed to keep details of their activities secret from even their shareholders since they are considered "classified" military information.)

American tax-payers will cetainly want to know about that. And they will also want to know that, at the moment at least, these companies are operating without any sort of written regulations, as well as any real civilian, military or judicial oversight. One reason that they are growing so rapidly is that this allows the government to engage in military action without having to achieve the public consensus necessary to use the official U.S. military. They don't even have to tell the taxpayers, not even Congress necessarily, exactly what they're paying these people, since that is information is "classified."

And if you're an American voter, you will almost certainly want to know that both Bush and Kerry have very extensive and close relationships to the individuals running these companies, and that both of their families are profiting very handsomely from it. Not surprising since both are members of the notorious "Skull and Bones" fraternity at Yale, and that their many fraternity brothers are well represented among the groups of people both awarding and receiving these contracts. Not to mention among the groups of people donating to their campaigns. And Kerry, of course, is a part of the fraternity known as the U.S. Senate, an insiders' club of millionaires and billionaires (Kerry's family's net worth is close to a billion), whose members, both Democrat and Republican, virtually all voted to go to war in Iraq, and most of whom, coincidentally, also have enormous investments in the growing private military, or very close and long-standing relationships with those who do.

At least the folks at Business Week have the guts to at least wonder if it is "out of control?" Of course it is.

 permanent link image permalink, posted by mike on Monday, May 24, 2004 at 11:37 AM


Entire state of Vermont makes endangered places list.

An amazing article in the San Francisco Chronicle reports that the entire state of Vermont has made the National Trust for Historic Preservation's list of endangered places, because of the threat of damage from Wal-Mart.

Famous for its fall foliage, quaint towns and covered bridges, the state of Vermont -- and its charm -- is threatened by a corporate behemoth, a nonprofit preservation group warned on Monday.

The alleged culprit: Wal-Mart.

Because of plans for several new Wal-Mart Supercenters across the state, the National Trust for Historic Preservation has placed the entire state of Vermont on its 2004 list of the most endangered historic places in the United States.

The 10 other sites on the list include Nine Mile Canyon in Utah, with its 10,000 Native American rock-art images; the Ridgewood Ranch in northern California, the home and final resting place of legendary racehorse Seabiscuit; and Pennsylvania's Bethlehem Works steel plant.

Vermont is the only state ever to make the annual list in its entirety.

The basic argument seems to be that the scale of Wal-Mart's proposed developments is such that they would literally wipe out the state's small towns. Naturally the folks at the corporate monster deny this, and say that they are just trying to help the economy there.

 permanent link image permalink, posted by mike on Monday, May 24, 2004 at 10:52 AM



May 15, 2004


The American climate of torture.

The Asia Times, a superb source of objective information on global affairs, is running a series on America's climate of torture, Brutality Starts At Home, which shows how what has become a pervasive pattern and practice of torturing and abusing its own citizens, especially its children, has now begun to be exported to the rest of the world.

The two articles are Torture? Just another day at the office by Ritt Goldstein, and Abuse travels very well by Jack Smith.

In the first Goldstein reviews the increasing amount of violence by American police officers (and others, but especially by the police) over the past decades, and shows how it has created an environment where torture and abuse are considered not only acceptable, but admirable and essential.

His review of a number of cases is particularly effective.

In 1998, Human Rights Watch (HRW) released a report on systemic, coast-to-coast abuse by US law enforcement, "Shielded from Justice". The report found a pervasive violation of "the public's trust", coupled with "defective" accountability systems and a "tolerant" leadership, allowing US law enforcement to commit crimes with "impunity" nationwide. As regards what the effective acceptance of the abuse of such authority has meant in the United States:

A November 10, 2003 report by Houston's 11 News began: "Where can you lie, cheat or steal and still keep your job? Or how about repeatedly getting drunk and getting behind the wheel? Or assaulting your wife or girlfriend? The answer in dozens of cases is the Houston Police Department."

Paralleling Iraqi charges of sodomizing prisoners, the most famous case in the US was that of Abner Louima in 1997, sodomized with a toilet plunger, with the blood and feces-covered plunger then used to break out his front teeth. When initially investigated by New York City police, the incident was reported as "self-inflicted"; though officer Justin Volpe later pleaded guilty to the crime. The latest major news report of similar conduct was provided in the November 7, 2003 Minneapolis Star Tribune, with Stephen Porter alleging that "police sexually assaulted him with the handle of a toilet plunger", the paper reported, noting a witness account appeared to corroborate Porter's story.

HRW's report also addressed the "repeated practice of torture by Chicago police", with electric shock being the favored technique, supplemented by burning prisoners. "Shielded from Justice" specifically cites a report of electric shock applied to the "head and genitals". The group notes that after the city "settled the claim of 13-year-old Marcus Wiggins", the attorneys representing the boy in his torture suit were able to secure internal police documents, providing further evidence to support torture claims. The City of Chicago did eventually acknowledge that "planned torture" occurred.

While US media have reported the use of dogs and armed threat against Iraqi detainees, a November 7, 2003 report by CBS News detailed a police drug raid on Stratford High School in Goose Creek, South Carolina. There, students were forced to "lie on the floor", while they endured "guns put to their head and a K9 dog". Notably, no drugs were found in the "commando-style raid", according to CBS, but the "school's principal defends the dramatic sweep", they reported.

As regards charges that chemicals from broken light fixtures were poured on some Iraqi detainees, the March 20, 2004 New York Times reported on a police officer "spraying pepper spray (a powerful chemical irritant used by police) into the mouth of a man who died in custody after being wrongly picked up". Lesser incidents of pepper spray abuse are widely reported as virtually commonplace.

Regarding the alleged rape of a young Iraqi man in custody, reports of sexual assault by US law enforcement frequently surface; notably, a number of these have been alleged incidents of a male officer attacking a female officer. As regards the sexual violation of young people, a June 25, 2003 report by the Associated Press began by noting that "at least a dozen teenagers assigned to work with police departments as part of the Boy Scouts' Law Enforcement Explorers program have allegedly been sexually abused by officers during the past year", with the incidents reported from coast-to-coast. The article mentioned some specific cases, including a Texas case where "former police officer John Ross Ewing, 28, was indicted by a grand jury in March on charges that he sexually assaulted two male Explorer scouts, ages 15 and 16".

In the other article, Smith reviews the history of American violence and torture, and showing how, contrary to Bush's assertion that "that's not the way we do things in America," it actually is exactly the way Americans do things, and always have.

Actually, torture is not uncommon in terms of Washington's interaction with many other countries and in the overall "war on terrorism". Let's look at a few of Washington's experiences with torture in modern times.

After organizing the overthrow of the elected government of Iran in 1953 in order to install a puppet monarchy in Teheran - a political catastrophe resulting in the torture and deaths of thousands of defenders of democracy - the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) created SAVIC, one of the most vicious secret police agencies in the world. To protect its investment, the CIA trained SAVIC in the most up-to-day varieties of torture, which it deployed with abandon until the Shah of Iran was ousted a quarter-century later.

Starting in the mid-1960s, various US government agencies trained the right-wing regime in Uruguay in the refinements of torture. In addition to providing lessons, and taking part in the torture of dissidents and suspected communists in Uruguay, the CIA offered two-month training courses in the US. Over the years the same instructions were provided to the governments of Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras and other Latin American regimes, leading to the mass use of torture in Latin America and to the creation of the notorious death squads.

America's most well documented direct participation in mass torture took place during the Vietnam War years when the CIA and US soldiers subjected tens of thousands of poor peasants and "Viet Cong" suspects to the most painful punishments devised since the Inquisition. My Lai was not unique. Nearly 30 years after Vietnam was liberated, the hidden horrors perpetuated by the US are still emerging. The Toledo (Ohio) Blade newspaper won a Pulitzer Prize last month for exposing the atrocities and tortures conducted by the so-called Tiger Force unit.

The US involvement with torture has increased measurably since the Bush administration launched its "war on terrorism" in September 2001, but most of it is conducted outside the country in various concentration camps operated by the Pentagon in Iraq, Afghanistan and Guantanamo Bay (Cuba); in smaller secret facilities run by the CIA in unnamed locations in order to interrogate alleged top al-Qaeda suspects; and in foreign countries within Washington's orbit which engage in torture themselves.

These are just selections. Both articles go on to offer more instances, and to provide some chilling conclusions. But at this point it's becoming clear that this isn't a few "bad apples", but the very heart of American culture and represents the views and desires of the majority of the American people. At least the white ones.

(Virtually all of the instances of torture are of whites torturing non-whites. Not entirely so, but very close. I didn't see any African-American or Mexican-American soldiers in those photos. There may have been some, but I for one believe that one of the major factors underlying these actions is a pervasive belief that non-whites are simply non-human, and aren't deserving of any respect or consideration.)

And this clearly isn't entirely due to the Republicans, although so many so-called liberals would like you to believe it is. On the contrary. Is it just coincidence that under the regime of Democrats Bill Clinton and Al Gore, two white southerners, the rate of incarceration of people of color accelerated so rapidly, and that the reports of torture by white police became so commonplace? As Goldstein notes:

Addressing the results of domestic allegations made to the Civil Rights Division of the US Justice Department, HRW (Human Rights Watch) found that of 10,129 civil rights cases that were reviewed, approximately 1 in 500 resulted in a Justice Department attempt to prosecute. More disturbing, HRW found that in some US police departments the particularly abusive officers are "often rewarded", being given "positive evaluations and promotions".

The HRW report was issued in 1998. That is, during the Clinton-Gore administration. As I say, two white southerners. It's time the Democrats acknowledged this, and stopped blaming Bush for everything.

Since the 2000 elections, many Democrats have been claiming that Bush stole the election, in particular claiming that many thousands of African-American Floridians had been wrongly disenfrancised, and that their votes would have turned the tide. But the policies to (unconstitutionally by the way) take away the vote from so-called drug users was vigorously supported and enforced by Bill Clinton. Al Gore never once mentioned it during the election.]

Which is not to say that only whites commit torture and other crimes. On the contrary. See the post I made yesterday on an article by Arundhati Roy detailing incidents of the same type of thing in India. And there are many similar stories coming out of Africa. But unlike Americans the people in these places don't have the power or resources to implement this as a worldwide strategy, and to continue with it decade after decade after decade.

 permanent link image permalink, posted by mike on Saturday, May 15, 2004 at 03:11 PM


Sympathy for Lynndie England.

Via The Pinocchio Theory, Steven Shaviro's highly literate weblog, and one new to me. An excellent and thought-provoking essay.

And now those pictures have been published, and you are the most infamous woman in the world; and they're going to throw the book at you, and basically you have no future and no hope. But of course somebody has to take the fall; and of course it will never be the people who imagined it, who organized it, who trained you in it, who told you to do it, and whose dreams of conquering and looting the world you were never really privy to. They can't be blamed, so it has to be somebody like you, who was poor and without prospects to begin with. No matter how deeply you felt that esprit de corps, you never were a member of that elite, and you never would be; you were expendable from the beginning, and your life is the price our rulers are happily willing to pay, as they pursue their program of conquest and domination.

He's perfectly correct of course. They take poor, uneducated people, who mostly joined up simply because they couldn't find any other job, or any other way out of their particular dead end, train them to be killers, and to do their dirty work for them, and then blame them when the going gets tough. Reminds me of that line from Dylan's License to Kill, "And his brain has been mismanaged with great skill."

 permanent link image permalink, posted by mike on Saturday, May 15, 2004 at 02:00 PM



May 14, 2004


Red Cross report on Iraqi prisons.

Here's a link to the complete Red Cross report published last February. Full title: Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) on the Treatment by the Coalition Forces of Prisoners of War and Other Protected Persons by the Geneva Conventions in Iraq During Arrest, Internment and Interrogation.

Here's the conclusion:

CONCLUSION

59. This ICRC report documents serious violations of International Humanitarian Law relating to the conditions of treatment of the persons deprived of their liberty held by the CF in Iraq. In particular, it establishes that persons deprived of their liberty face the risk of being subjected to a process of physical and psychological coercion, in some cases tantamount to torture, in the early stages of the internment process.

60. Once the interrogation process is over, the conditions of treatment for the persons deprived of their liberty generally improve. except in the "High Value Detainee" section at Baghdad International Airport where persons deprived of their liberty have been held for nearly 23 hours a day in strict solitary confinement in small concrete cells devoid of daylight, an internment regime which does not comply with provisions of the Third and Fourth Geneva Conventions.

61. During internment, persons deprived of their liberty also risk being victims of disproportionate and excessive use of force on the part of detaining authorities attempting to restore order in the event of unrest or to prevent escapes.

62. Another serious violation of International Humanitarian Law described in the report is the CF's inability or lack of will to set up a system of notifications of arrests for the families of persons deprived of liberty in Iraq. This violation of provisions of International Humanitarian Law causes immense distress among persons deprived of their liberty and their families, the latter fearing that their relatives unaccounted for are dead. The uncaring behaviour of the CF and their inability to quickly provide accurate information on persons. deprived of their liberty for the families concerned also seriously affects the image of the Occupying Powers amongst the Iraqi population.

63. In addition to recommendations highlighted in the report relating to conditions of internment, information given to persons deprived of their liberty upon arrest, and the need to investigate violations of International Humanitarian Law and to prosecute those found responsible, the ICRC wishes particularly to remind the CF of their duty:

  • to respect at all times the human dignity, physical integrity and cultural sensitivity of persons deprived of their liberty held under their control;

  • to set up a system of notifications of arrests to ensure that the families of persons deprived of their liberty are quickly and accurately informed; to prevent all forms of ill-treatment and moral or physical coercion of persons deprived of their liberty in connection with interrogations;

  • to instruct the arresting and detaining authorities that causing serious bodily injury or serious harm to the health of protected persons is prohibited under the Third and Fourth Geneva Conventions

  • to set up an internment regime that ensures respect for the psychological integrity and human dignity of the persons deprived of their liberty

  • to ensure that battle group units arresting individuals and staff in charge of internment facilities receive adequate training enabling them to operate in a proper manner and fulfill their responsibilities without resorting to ill-treatment or using excessive force.
The practices described in this report are prohibited under International Humanitarian Law. They warrant serious attention by the CF. In particular, the CF should review their policies and practices, take corrective action and improve the treatment of prisoners of war and other protected persons under their authority. This report is part of the bilateral and confidential dialogue undertaken by the ICRC with the CF. In the future, the ICRC will continue its bilateral and confidential dialogue with the CF in accordance with provisions of International Humanitarian Law, on the basis of monitoring the conditions of arrest, interrogation and internment of persons deprived of their liberty held by the CF.


 permanent link image permalink, posted by mike on Friday, May 14, 2004 at 04:12 PM



May 13, 2004


More shocking photos from Iraq.

The New York Post reports on the "shocking" photos shown to selected members of Congress yesterday. There are, of course, tons of articles on this subject. This one focuses on the sexual romps that the soldiers were engaged in while supposedly serving their country.

Shocking shots of sexcapades involving Pfc. Lynndie England were among the hundreds of X-rated photos and videos from the Abu Ghraib prison scandal shown to lawmakers in a top-secret Capitol conference room yesterday.

"She was having sex with numerous partners. It appeared to be consensual," said a lawmaker who saw the photos.

And, videos showed the disgraced soldier - made notorious in a photo showing her holding a leash looped around an Iraqi prisoner's neck - engaged in graphic sex acts with other soldiers in front of Iraqi prisoners, Pentagon officials told NBC Nightly News.

"Almost everybody was naked all the time," another lawmaker said.

...

"It was significantly worse than I had anticipated," said Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore). "Take the worst case and multiply it over several times."

The article notes that Private England, the woman in some of the most infamous photos, has been claiming that the photos showing her holding someone on a leash and so on were all done under strict orders. But these newest ones clearly show her voluntarily engaging in sexual activity, and, apparently, clearly relishing it.

It appears that they're going to try to prevent the release of these to the public. "Too disturbing to release" they claim. I know that the folks in Congress, not to mention the Defense Department, are out of touch with reality, but I can't believe that they seriously think that there's any chance that these photos won't make it out soon. Even if they don't do so officially, then someone, somewhere, will do it unofficially. You can count on it. You just can't hide that kind of thing any more.

Did you catch Rumsfeld's comments, in his recent testimony to Congress, about how irritating it is to live in an age of digital cameras and video recorders.

We're functioning in a -- with peacetime restraints, with legal requirements in a war-time situation, in the information age, where people are running around with digital cameras and taking these unbelievable photographs and then passing them off, against the law, to the media, to our surprise, when they had not even arrived in the Pentagon.

Ha! There's so much to say about these. One thing though that they make very clear: the troops over there certainly have plenty of time on their hands. It'll be hard to justify demands for more troops when it would seem that those over there aren't spending much time fighting, but are just horsing around and indulging themselves.

 permanent link image permalink, posted by mike on Thursday, May 13, 2004 at 03:56 PM


Vonnegut explains America.

Via Common Dreams, is this essay, Cold Turkey , by esteemed American writer and philosopher Kurt Vonnegut, in which he explains our political system, the world we live in, why neither of those make any sense, our addiction to fossil fuels (what the title refers to), why we're here, and why there's nothing we can do about that, what the war on drugs is all about, and many other things which have probably long puzzled you. Yes, all in one essay.

As always he doesn't mince words. Here's how he begins.

Many years ago, I was so innocent I still considered it possible that we could become the humane and reasonable America so many members of my generation used to dream of. We dreamed of such an America during the Great Depression, when there were no jobs. And then we fought and often died for that dream during the Second World War, when there was no peace.

But I know now that there is not a chance in hell of Americas becoming humane and reasonable. Because power corrupts us, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Human beings are chimpanzees who get crazy drunk on power. By saying that our leaders are power-drunk chimpanzees, am I in danger of wrecking the morale of our soldiers fighting and dying in the Middle East? Their morale, like so many bodies, is already shot to pieces. They are being treated, as I never was, like toys a rich kid got for Christmas.

******

When you get to my age, if you get to my age, which is 81, and if you have reproduced, you will find yourself asking your own children, who are themselves middle-aged, what life is all about. I have seven kids, four of them adopted.

Many of you reading this are probably the same age as my grandchildren. They, like you, are being royally shafted and lied to by our Baby Boomer corporations and government.

I put my big question about life to my biological son Mark. Mark is a pediatrician, and author of a memoir, The Eden Express. It is about his crackup, straightjacket and padded cell stuff, from which he recovered sufficiently to graduate from Harvard Medical School.

Dr. Vonnegut said this to his doddering old dad: Father, we are here to help each other get through this thing, whatever it is. So I pass that on to you. Write it down, and put it in your computer, so you can forget it.

I guess that's really it: we're here to help each other through this thing, whatever it is. Sometimes that's hard to remember. But now it's in my computer, as he advises, so if you ever forget you know where you can come read it and be reminded.

Oh, and he says our addiction to fossil fuel is about to come back to haunt us. That we're about to go "Cold Turkey." Personally, I have to disagree with that one. I think the end of the fossil fuel age, or even just substantially higher prices for oil, will cause us to break through to a new age of cleaner and better and cheaper energy. That it won't be a disaster at all, but a blessing in disguise. But we shall see.

And I also have to disagree with that nonsense about the Baby Boomer corporations. As far as I can see our system, political and economic, was set up by his generation, the so-called Greatest Generation, which I personally consider to be the Worst Ever. But his generation loves blaming other people for their problems. It's their hobby I guess. But the Baby Boomers (god, how I hate that phrase) actually tried very hard to change it. But the old folks wouldn't listen.

On that same note, I have to say something else. I'm 51, been in America all of these years, and hearing the "Greatest Generation" complain about things all of that time. And I honestly can't recall even hearing any member of that generation come right out and admit that they were wrong about anything. Not one single solitary time. That includes my parents and everyone else of that age. And not just those on the right either. But folks like Kesey and Kerouac too, also part of that generation. For whatever reason these people just are incapable of accepting responsibility for their actions and of facing up to the truth. Like Vonnegut, they always look for someone else to blame. Always.

But who am I to contradict someone who's sold so many books? Mostly to the Baby Boomers themselves, now that I think about it. And call me an incurable optimist if you must, but I think that there's at least "one chance in hell" for America to pull it together. Maybe even more than that. Low odds I admit, but nothing lasts forever. America too shall pass, and whatever comes after it will be better.

 permanent link image permalink, posted by mike on Thursday, May 13, 2004 at 03:27 PM



May 12, 2004


Number of US lifers grows to 128,000.

In the shortest news article I've ever seen, the Scotsman reports on the number of lifers and other prisoners in US prisons.

THE number of inmates serving life sentences in United States jails has risen by 83 per cent since 1992 and now account for one out of every 11 prisoners.

A report yesterday put the number of "lifers" at almost 128,000, out of a total of 2.2 million people behind bars.

This isn't a quote from the article. It's the entire thing. I guess sometimes words just aren't enough.

 permanent link image permalink, posted by mike on Wednesday, May 12, 2004 at 02:38 PM



May 09, 2004


Happy Mothers' Day.

The original Mother's Day Proclamation by Julia Ward Howe.

Arise, then, women of this day!

Arise all women who have hearts, whether your baptism be that of water or of fears!

Say firmly: "We will not have great questions decided by irrelevant agencies,

"Our husbands shall not come to us reeking with carnage, for caresses and applause.

"Our sons shall not be taken from us to unlearn all that we have been able to teach them of charity, mercy, and patience.

"We women of one country will be too tender of those of another country to allow our sons to be trained to injure theirs."

From the bosom of the devasted earth a voice goes up with our own. It says, "Disarm, Disarm!"

The sword of murder is not the balance of justice! Blood does not wipe out dishonor nor violence indicate possession.

As men have often forsaken the plow and the anvil at the summons of war, let women now leave all that may be left of home for a great and earnest day of counsel.

Let them meet first, as women, to bewail and commemorate the dead.

Let them then solemnly take counsel with each other as the means whereby the great human family can live in peace,

And each bearing after her own time the sacred impress, not of Caesar, but of God.


 permanent link image permalink, posted by mike on Sunday, May 9, 2004 at 04:57 PM



January 18, 2004


The insanity and intolerance of Americans.

Found this collection of quotations from the American Christian right, who are trying to take over America. People should know who they're dealing with, and just how intolerant they are. Via this excellent free-thinker's site, which contains information all sorts of religion.

I know it's a huge post, but it's something people should know. When these people espouse tolerance or freedom of religion, it's just a tactic to use until they get their way. They don't believe in those things, or the constitution or America or anything except their own absolutism.

"(W)hile it is true that the United States of America was founded on the sacred principle of religious freedom for all, that liberty was never intended to exalt other religions to the level that Christianity holds in our country's heritage. Our Founders expected that Christianity -- and no other religion -- would receive support from the government as long as that support did not violate peoples' consciences and their right to worship. They would have found utterly incredible the idea that all religions, including paganism, be treated with equal deference. As for our Hindu priest friend, the United States is a nation that has historically honored the one true God. Woe be to us on that day when we relegate him to being merely one among countless other deities in the pantheon of theologies." -- Family Research Council, Culture Facts newsletter 9/21/2000, commenting on a Hindu priest giving the opening prayer in the House of Representatives.

"I want you to just let a wave of intolerance wash over you. I want you to let a wave of hatred wash over you. Yes, hate is good... Our goal is a Christian nation. We have a biblical duty, we are called on by God to conquer this country. We don't want equal time. We don't want pluralism." -- Randall Terry, The News Sentinel, (Ft. Wayne, IN.), 8/16/93.

"We are to make Bible-obeying disciples of anybody that gets in our way." -- Jay Grimstead, February 1987.

"Nobody has the right to worship on this planet any other God than Jehovah. And therefore the state does not have the responsibility to defend anybody's pseudo-right to worship an idol." -- Rev. Joseph Morecraft, Chalcedon Presbyterian Church, "Biblical Role of Civil Government" speech given 8/31/93 at Biblical Worldview and Christian Education Conference.

"This is God's world, not Satan's. Christians are the lawful heirs, not non-Christians." -- Gary North, Political Polytheism: The Myth of Pluralism (Tyler, TX: Institute for Christian Economics, 1989), p. 102.

"[W]e need a legal strategy which protects the rights of those of us who hold Christian convictions which will afford us the opportunity to contend once again for the mind of this culture." -- Keith A. Fournier, ACLJ brochure "Religious Cleansing".

"America is under the judgment of God. And if we are ever going to rebuild this country, it must be under God's law. Our goal must be simple: We must have a Christian nation built on God's law, on the Ten Commandments. No apologies." -- Randall Terry, Operation Rescue, address to "Cities of Refuge" campaign, Willoughby Hills, OH, July, 1993.

"A cult is any group that has a form of godliness, but does not recognize Jesus Christ as the unique son of God."....."One test of a cult is that it often does not strictly teach that Jesus is the only begotten Son of God who HImself is God manifested in the flesh."......"Christian-oriented cults include the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints or Reorganized Church of Latter Day Saints (Mormons), the Worldwide Church of God, Christian Science, Unity, Unitarianism, The Way International, Rosicrucian Society of America, Bahai, Hare Krishna, Scientology, the Unification Church, and the Jehovah's Witnesses." -- CBN pamphlet "Cults," 1992.

"When the Christian majority takes over this country, there will be no satanic churches, no more free distribution of pornography, no more talk of rights for homosexuals. After the Christian majority takes control, pluralism will be seen as immoral and evil and the state will not permit anybody the right to practice evil." -- Gary Potter, president of Catholics for Christian Political Action.

"If you're not a born-again Christian, you're a failure as a human being." -- Jerry Falwell.

"What this is coming down to is who runs the country. It's us against them. It's the good guys versus the bad guys. It's the God-fearing people against the pagans, and some of the pagans are going to church." -- Randall Terry, Operation Rescue, speech in Jackson, Miss., 4/92.

"The long-term goal of Christians in politics should be to gain exclusive control over the franchise. Those who refuse to submit publicly to the eternal sanctions of God by submitting to His Church's public marks of the covenant--baptism and holy communion--must be denied citizenship, just as they were in ancient Israel." -- Gary North - Political Polytheism: The Myth of Pluralism, Tyler, TX: Institute for Christian Economics, 1989, p. 87.

"There should be absolutely no 'Separation of Church and State' in America." -- David Barton, president of Wallbuilders, 1994 Anti-Defamation League Report.

"Most politically active Christians don't want equal time with homosexuals, abortionists, animal worshipping pagans, witches, radical feminis