May 15, 2004
Army-Times editorial on Abu Ghraib.
Those that think all outrage at the abuses comes from "liberals", "lefties," and general malcontents, and in particular, from those who are opposed to the military on general principle, might want to read a recent
editorial from the
Army-Times, hardly a hotbed of pacifist thought. They condemn it in no uncertain times, and even go so far as to state categorically that it is a problem caused by incompetence at the highest levels, not by just a few low-ranking soldiers.
Around the halls of the Pentagon, a term of caustic derision has emerged for the enlisted soldiers at the heart of the furor over the Abu Ghraib prison scandal: the six morons who lost the war.
Indeed, the damage done to the U.S. military and the nation as a whole by the horrifying photographs of U.S. soldiers abusing Iraqi detainees at the notorious prison is incalculable.
But the folks in the Pentagon are talking about the wrong morons.
There is no excuse for the behavior displayed by soldiers in the now-infamous pictures and an even more damning report by Army Maj. Gen. Antonio Taguba. Every soldier involved should be ashamed.
But while responsibility begins with the six soldiers facing criminal charges, it extends all the way up the chain of command to the highest reaches of the military hierarchy and its civilian leadership.
The entire affair is a failure of leadership from start to finish. From the moment they are captured, prisoners are hooded, shackled and isolated. The message to the troops: Anything goes.
In addition to the scores of prisoners who were humiliated and demeaned, at least 14 have died in custody in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Army has ruled at least two of those homicides. This is not the way a free people keeps its captives or wins the hearts and minds of a suspicious world.
...
One can only wonder why the prison wasn’t razed in the wake of the invasion as a symbolic stake through the heart of the Baathist regime.
...
This was not just a failure of leadership at the local command level. This was a failure that ran straight to the top. Accountability here is essential — even if that means relieving top leaders from duty in a time of war.
Fairly extraordinary, given that it comes straight from the soldiers who are actually fighting and dying in this war. Having said that, however, I still have to wonder how much the "code of silence" that permeates both American police and military forces contributed to the problem. And I have to wonder why the Army-Times themselves didn't report on the problem much earlier. If the reports that CD's of the photos were routinely shared in Army mess-halls are true, then knowledge of what was going on was definitely widespread within the troops themselves, and, presumably, by reporters for the Army-times. Why didn't they speak up?
I'd never browsed there before, but the
Army Times site is rather interesting. Turns out there is also a
NavyTimes, a
Marine Corps Times, and a
Air Force Times. And a
Military City site that shows the best of all of these.